2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603257113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of genetic flux between bacteria by restriction–modification systems

Abstract: Restriction-modification (R-M) systems are often regarded as bacteria's innate immune systems, protecting cells from infection by mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Their diversification has been recently associated with the emergence of particularly virulent lineages. However, we have previously found more R-M systems in genomes carrying more MGEs. Furthermore, it has been suggested that R-M systems might favor genetic transfer by producing recombinogenic double-stranded DNA ends. To test whether R-M systems fav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
159
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, although the two models operate simultaneously, it is important to note the two models may influence certain taxa at different frequencies. For example, Pseudomonas syringae was found to have a rate of HGT four orders of magnitude higher than that found in Bacillus, Streptococcus, and Corynebacterium isolates (Nowell et al, 2014;Vos et al, 2015), which may be facilitated by the abundance of restriction-modification systems in the genome (Oliveira et al, 2016). Similarly, mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system can result in increased mutation rates for specific sub-taxa (Vulic et al, 1999;Schofield and Hsieh, 2003).…”
Section: Other Models Of Microdiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although the two models operate simultaneously, it is important to note the two models may influence certain taxa at different frequencies. For example, Pseudomonas syringae was found to have a rate of HGT four orders of magnitude higher than that found in Bacillus, Streptococcus, and Corynebacterium isolates (Nowell et al, 2014;Vos et al, 2015), which may be facilitated by the abundance of restriction-modification systems in the genome (Oliveira et al, 2016). Similarly, mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system can result in increased mutation rates for specific sub-taxa (Vulic et al, 1999;Schofield and Hsieh, 2003).…”
Section: Other Models Of Microdiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent extensive genomic analysis has revealed a strong connection between the abundance of RM modules and MGEs in microbial genomes, suggesting that although RM systems are rarely encoded by plasmids or prophages, they nevertheless disseminate with the help of MGEs (123). Conversely, the abundance of RM modules also strongly positively correlates with the estimated rate of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), suggesting a major role of RM in this process (124). These findings indicate that the roles of RM in prokaryotes go beyond defense functions (41).…”
Section: Innate Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, motifs methylated by these two orphan MTases appear as only partially methylated, suggesting the possible existence of methylation patterns or phasevarions controlled by these MTases, although their function remains elusive. So far, the methylomes of ~20 Alphaproteobacteria have been characterized using SMRT sequencing (Kozdon et al, 2013;Blow et al, 2016) and bioinformatics searches indicate that genes encoding putative DNA MTases are frequently found in alphaproteobacterial genomes (Roberts et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2016). The function of some of these MTases has now been characterized in more details.…”
Section: Methylated Dna Motifs and Dna Methyltransferases In Alphapromentioning
confidence: 99%