1968
DOI: 10.2307/2483674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Leaf Shape in Proserpinaca palustris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these leaf primordia are structurally identical at inception and cannot be distinguished except by position, very shortly after this, when primordia are 70-90 pm in length, their pathways of development diverge and the ultimate form of the leaf is established at an early stage. This is similar to Carya (Foster 1935a(Foster , 1935b and Morus alba (Cross 1936(Cross , 1937 bud scales and foliage leaves but in contrast with the situation in Ranuncz~lus (Schmidt and Millington 1968) where water and land forms of leaves are identical until primordia are 500 pm in length. However, in Salvi~za, leaf form is not environmentally controlled as in some other heterophyllous aquatic plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these leaf primordia are structurally identical at inception and cannot be distinguished except by position, very shortly after this, when primordia are 70-90 pm in length, their pathways of development diverge and the ultimate form of the leaf is established at an early stage. This is similar to Carya (Foster 1935a(Foster , 1935b and Morus alba (Cross 1936(Cross , 1937 bud scales and foliage leaves but in contrast with the situation in Ranuncz~lus (Schmidt and Millington 1968) where water and land forms of leaves are identical until primordia are 500 pm in length. However, in Salvi~za, leaf form is not environmentally controlled as in some other heterophyllous aquatic plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although these changes in leaf morphology have different degrees of expression which may be separated into categories, e.g., heterophylly, lateral or habitual, anisophylly heteroblastic leaf series, the unifying feature of interest in this phenomenon is that different pathways of leaf development exist within a given species. Numerous studies describing ontogeny of divergent leaf types have dealt with angiosperm species (Kaplan 1970(Kaplan , 1973(Kaplan , 1975Schmidt and Millington 1968;Bostrack and Millington 1962;Cook 1969;Jones 1956;McCallum 1902;McCully and Dale 1961;Foster 1935a, 19356;Cross 1936Cross , 1937, but fewer studies have been conducted on fern leaf ontogeny and its aspects (Steeves and Briggs 1958;Crotty 1955;Cutter 1955;Pray 1960Pray , 1962Gaudet 1964aGaudet , 19646, 1965Sossountzov 1965;Saha 1963). This presumably is due to crozier formation in ferns and the resulting orientation problems which make interpretation of sectioned material difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the anatomical point of view, the thin and elongated shapes of submerged leaves are commonly accompanied by elongated epidermal cells (Schmidt and Millington 1968;Deschamp and Cooke 1983;Young et al 1987;Goliber and Feldman 1990). In one case, gibberellins (GAs) are likely to be involved as an endogenous factor that induces the formation of submerged leaves with elongated epidermal cells (Deschamp and Cooke 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past three decades developmental studies have appeared for a number of heterophyllic aquatic species including Ranunculus flabellaris (Bostrack and Millington, 1962), Proserpinaca palustris (Schmidt and Millington, 1968), Ranunculus aquatilis (Cook, 1969), Callitriche intermedia (Jones, 1955), and Callitriche heterophylla (Deschamp and Cooke, 1985). A number of general conclusions can be drawn from these studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%