Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 2017
DOI: 10.4337/9781782540465.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of medical professions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their evidence suggests that it is what they describe as 'market forces' which are most important. Olsen (2002) in a review of the empirical literature on licensure in medical professions 9 concludes that the evidence is mixed and varies across both time and the professions covered. Button and Fleming (1992) studied the licensing of architects in the UK but found no conclusive evidence of an impact on incomes.…”
Section: Restrictions On Competition In Professional Service Marmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their evidence suggests that it is what they describe as 'market forces' which are most important. Olsen (2002) in a review of the empirical literature on licensure in medical professions 9 concludes that the evidence is mixed and varies across both time and the professions covered. Button and Fleming (1992) studied the licensing of architects in the UK but found no conclusive evidence of an impact on incomes.…”
Section: Restrictions On Competition In Professional Service Marmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possibly explained, asOlsen (2002) implies, by the normative nature of the market failure approach and the positive nature of the capture theory. The empirical evidence is usually marshalled by those looking for evidence that regulation acts to the benefit of the profession and not the consumer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%