21One of the fundamental reactions of the innate immune responses to pathogen infection is the 22 release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, processed by the NLRP3 inflammasome. 23 STING is essential for innate immune responses and inflammasome activation. Here we reveal a 24 distinct mechanism by which STING regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome activation, IL-1β 25 secretion, and inflammatory responses in human cell lines, mice primary cells, and mice. 26 Interestingly, upon HSV-1 infection and cytosolic DNA stimulation, STING binds to NLRP3 and 27 promotes the inflammasome activation through two approaches. First, STING recruits NLRP3 and 28 promotes NLRP3 translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby facilitating the inflammasome 29 formation. Second, STING interacts with NLRP3 and removes K48-and K63-linked 30 polyubiquitination of NLRP3, thereby promoting the inflammasome activation. Collectively, we 31 demonstrate that the cGAS-STING-NLRP3 signaling is essential for host defense against DNA 32 virus infection. 33 34 Keywords: Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)/Herpes simplex virus type 1 35 (HSV-1)/Interleukine-1(IL-1)/Polyubiquitination and deubiquitination/The cGAS-STING 36 pathway 37 38 3 75NLRP3 polyubiquitination, thereby promoting the inflammasome activation. We propose that the 76 cGAS-cGAMP-STING-NLRP3 axis is essential for host defense against DNA virus infection. 77 78 5 Results 79 80STING interacts with NLRP3 to facilitate the inflammasome activation. 81 We initially determined the correlation between STING and NLRP3, and showed that STING and 82 NLRP3 interacted with each other in human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells ( Fig 1A, B). The 83 NLRP3 inflammasome consists of three major components, NLRP3, ASC, and pro-Casp-1 84 (Schroder & Tschopp, 2010). We explored whether STING interacts with ASC and/or pro-Casp-1, 85 and clearly revealed that STING interacted with NLRP3, but not with ASC or pro-Casp-1 ( Fig 1C). 86 NLRP3 protein harbors several prototypic domains, including PYRIN domain (PYD), 87 NACHT-associated domain (NAD), and Leucine rich repeats (LRR) (Ye & Ting, 2008). Next, the 88 domain of NLRP3 involved in the interaction with STING was determined by evaluating the 89 plasmids encoding NLRP3, PYRIN, NACHT, or LRR (Figure 1D) as described previously (Wang et 90 al, 2018). Like NLRP3, NACHT and LRR interacted with STING, but PYRIN failed to interact 91 with STING (Figure 1E), and consistently, STING interacted with NLRP3, NACHT, and LRR (Fig 92 1F, lanes 2, 6 and 8), but not with PYRIN (Fig 1F, lane 4). In another hand, STING comprises five 93 putative transmembrane (TM) regions (Ishikawa & Barber, 2008). The domain of STING required 94for the interaction with NLRP3 was assessed by analyzing plasmids encoding wild-type (WT) 95 STING and seven truncated proteins ( Fig 1G). Like WT STING(1-379aa) ( Fig 1H, lane 9), the 96 truncated proteins STING(1-160aa), STING(1-240aa), STING(41-379aa), STING(81-379aa), and 97 STING(111-379aa) interacted strongly with NLRP3 ( Fig...