1992
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/85.3.310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Parasitoid Sex Allocation and Host Growth by Cotesia (Apanteles) kariyai (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…attaining greater total final mass than normal unparasitized larvae at the same developmental stage (Slansky, 1978;Beckage and Riddiford, 1983;Tanaka et al, 1992). We failed to observe larger parasitized larvae under any of the nutritional conditions investigated during this study.…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologycontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…attaining greater total final mass than normal unparasitized larvae at the same developmental stage (Slansky, 1978;Beckage and Riddiford, 1983;Tanaka et al, 1992). We failed to observe larger parasitized larvae under any of the nutritional conditions investigated during this study.…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologycontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Numerous studies, including investigations of a variety of lepidopteran insects parasitized by Cotesia spp. demonstrate that decreased food consumption accompanies the above effects (Tanaka et al, 1992;Alleyne and Beckage, 1997). Otherwise, little is understood of the potential effects of nutrition on parasitized host insects or of the importance of host nutrition to parasite success.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the gregarious larval endoparasitoid Cotesia kariyai, progeny sex ratio was reported to be more male-biased for large clutches laid in large hosts than that for small clutches laid in small hosts, and the number of female progeny seemed rather constant regardless of clutch size (Tanaka et al 1992). If C. kariyai uses a fixed amount of sperm per host, these results are easily explicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%