2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00198-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of pheromone inhibition in mated females of Choristoneura fumiferana and C. rosaceana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms that, the attractiveness of virgin females does not change much during the first few days of their lives (Delisle et al, 2000). Although most of the virgin females used in this study were reared in the laboratory on artificial diet, our comparisons of wild and laboratory-reared females indicate that there was no difference in their attractiveness to males in the field or in the concentration of the main component of their sex pheromone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms that, the attractiveness of virgin females does not change much during the first few days of their lives (Delisle et al, 2000). Although most of the virgin females used in this study were reared in the laboratory on artificial diet, our comparisons of wild and laboratory-reared females indicate that there was no difference in their attractiveness to males in the field or in the concentration of the main component of their sex pheromone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas weather, trophic interactions, and dispersal have been the main considerations in these arguments, the role of mating success has not been discussed. Females can mate several times during their life, although mated females are less attractive than virgins (Outram, 1968;Delisle et al, 2000). Virgin females eclosing from pupae perch on tree branches and begin 'calling' at dusk within 24 h by extruding their pheromone gland and emitting pheromone (Sanders & Lucuik, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to its allatotropic effect in D. melanogaster, DrmSP can also stimulate JH-II production by isolated corpora allata of H. armigera virgin females in vitro in a dose dependent manner (Fan et al, 1999). JH titers significantly increase in females of some moth species after mating and the involvement of JH in mating-induced pheromone suppression has been reported (Delisle et al, 2000;Ramaswamy et al, 1997). The JH analog, fenoxycarb, was shown to inhibit pheromone production by mature adult H. armigera females and to down-regulate the PBAN-receptor protein and gene transcript (Bober et al, 2009;Rafaeli and Bober, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…van Dijken et al (1993) also observed similar sex ratios in parasitized and superparasitized hosts in the parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi , suggesting that conspecific superparasitism does not contribute to sex ratio variability. van Dijken et al (1993) also observed similar sex ratios in parasitized and superparasitized hosts in the parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi , suggesting that conspecific superparasitism does not contribute to sex ratio variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%