2010
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.157164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Response Regulator Autophosphorylation through Interdomain Contacts

Abstract: DNA-binding response regulators (RRs) of the OmpR/PhoB subfamily alternate between inactive and active conformational states, with the latter having enhanced DNA-binding affinity. Phosphorylation of an aspartate residue in the receiver domain, usually via phosphotransfer from a cognate histidine kinase, stabilizes the active conformation. Many of the available structures of inactive OmpR/PhoB family proteins exhibit extensive interfaces between the N-terminal receiver and C-terminal DNA-binding domains. These … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
98
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2A). Receiver and DNA-binding domain packing arrangements are not conserved in available structures of inactive NarL/FixJ subfamily response regulators (12,13), suggesting that a variety of closed conformations have evolved as has been observed in the more widely characterized OmpR/PhoB winged-helix transcription factor response regulator subfamily (14). The association of the isolated VraR receiver domain (VraR REC ) and DNA-binding domain (VraR DBD ) is relatively weak, with a dissociation constant of 134 μM (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2A). Receiver and DNA-binding domain packing arrangements are not conserved in available structures of inactive NarL/FixJ subfamily response regulators (12,13), suggesting that a variety of closed conformations have evolved as has been observed in the more widely characterized OmpR/PhoB winged-helix transcription factor response regulator subfamily (14). The association of the isolated VraR receiver domain (VraR REC ) and DNA-binding domain (VraR DBD ) is relatively weak, with a dissociation constant of 134 μM (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiver domain inhibition by the effector domain stabilizes the inactive state for diverse response regulators that function as transcriptional factors (Barbieri et al, 2010). This functions to inhibit phosphorylation by metabolites such as acetyl phosphate, without influencing sensormediated phosphorylation (Barbieri et al, 2010;Da Re et al, 1999).…”
Section: Interactions In the Nar Cross-regulation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This functions to inhibit phosphorylation by metabolites such as acetyl phosphate, without influencing sensormediated phosphorylation (Barbieri et al, 2010;Da Re et al, 1999). Indeed, NarX robustly phosphorylates NarL both in vivo and in vitro , so the relatively small effect on NarX-NarL interaction implied by the BACTH analysis, if genuine, would not meaningfully influence phosphoryl transfer between this cognate pair.…”
Section: Interactions In the Nar Cross-regulation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition helixes of PrrA 9 and MtrA 10 are occluded by the REC-DBD interactions, which prevents them from binding to DNA in the inactive state. However, there is no interaction between REC and DBD in the DrrD 12 inactive structure 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural studies of inactive, unphosphorylated response regulators showed diverse interactions between REC and DBD. DrrB 8 , PrrA 9 and MtrA 10 have extensive interfaces between REC and DBD that inhibit phosphorylation of these response regulators by small-molecule phosphodonors 11 . The recognition helixes of PrrA 9 and MtrA 10 are occluded by the REC-DBD interactions, which prevents them from binding to DNA in the inactive state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%