1992
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of single quantal efficacy at the snake neuromuscular junction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparations were mounted in a chamber containing reptilian saline. The cut end of the central muscle's nerve was drawn into a suction electrode for stimulation with 200 µs negative‐going rectangular pulses of 2–7 V. Intracellular recording of endplate potentials (EPPs) and miniature endplate potentials (mEPPs) and subsequent analyses were performed using methods described elsewhere (Wilkinson et al 1992). Under these conditions, change in EPP amplitude reflects alteration in quantal content (Wilkinson et al 1996), not change in endplate sensitivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparations were mounted in a chamber containing reptilian saline. The cut end of the central muscle's nerve was drawn into a suction electrode for stimulation with 200 µs negative‐going rectangular pulses of 2–7 V. Intracellular recording of endplate potentials (EPPs) and miniature endplate potentials (mEPPs) and subsequent analyses were performed using methods described elsewhere (Wilkinson et al 1992). Under these conditions, change in EPP amplitude reflects alteration in quantal content (Wilkinson et al 1996), not change in endplate sensitivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centre muscle in each preparation was stimulated, with the two adjacent muscles serving as unstimulated controls for activity‐dependent staining, as described below. Intracellular recording of endplate potentials (EPPs) in curarized (30 μM) preparations and subsequent analyses were performed using methods described elsewhere (Wilkinson et al 1992); endplate sites were visualized using differential interference contrast optics. Sulphorhodamine 101 (SR101, 160 μg ml −1 ; Lichtman et al 1985; Teng et al 1999) was the endocytotic probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care was taken to set the threshold level of the amplitude discriminator used to detect MEPPs so that small and/or slow-rising MEPPs, if present, were acquired. Details of recording methods are presented elsewhere (Wilkinson, Lunin & Stevermer, 1992). Boutons were stimulated extracellularly using either of two methods.…”
Section: Preparation Of One-bouton Nmjsmentioning
confidence: 99%