1990
DOI: 10.1016/0011-2240(90)90043-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of supercooling and nucleation in a freeze intolerant beetle (Tenebrio molitor)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported that the capacity to supercool decreases with increasing body mass (Johnston and Lee, 1990;Lee and Costanzo, 1998). Although our data partly support these results, with the smallest eutardigrade in our study (M. sapiens) having the lowest (though not significantly so) SCP of all tested eutardigrades, it may be challenged by the presence of the much higher SCP of the equally small heterotardigrades E. granulatus and E. testudo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Several studies have reported that the capacity to supercool decreases with increasing body mass (Johnston and Lee, 1990;Lee and Costanzo, 1998). Although our data partly support these results, with the smallest eutardigrade in our study (M. sapiens) having the lowest (though not significantly so) SCP of all tested eutardigrades, it may be challenged by the presence of the much higher SCP of the equally small heterotardigrades E. granulatus and E. testudo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…If all larvae are likely to require THPs eventually, constitutive THP expression is not necessarily wasteful, particularly if the proteins are degraded very slowly. As well, Johnston & Lee [22] found that the supercooling ability of T. molitor larvae was inversely proportional to their mass. Therefore, larger larvae may constitutively express moderate levels of THPs to provide at least a few degrees of protection in the case of a sudden temperature decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Probably the most frequently documented variation in low‐temperature thermotolerance of insects associated with ontogeny is that attributed to variation among life stages (e.g. Tucić, 1979; Chen, Denlinger & Lee, 1987; Punzo & Huff, 1988; Bale, 1991; Johnston & Lee, 1990; Czajka & Lee, 1990; Brokerhof, Morton & Banks, 1993; Watson & Hoffmann, 1995; Gilchrist et al , 1997; Vernon & Vannier, 1996; Klok & Chown, 2001; Carrillo et al , 2005; Jensen et al , 2007; Terblanche et al , 2007 b ). For example, Paractora dreuxi larvae had lower CTmin than adults (‐5.1°C vs. ‐2.7°C) (Klok & Chown, 2001), while supercooling points (SCP or crystallization temperature) varied among ‐22.6, ‐13.0, ‐16.2, ‐16.9, ‐18.9 and ‐18.7°C in eggs, second instar larvae, final‐instar larvae, pupae, adult females and adult males, respectively, of the tineid moth Tineola bisselliella (Chauvin & Vannier, 1997).…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%