2013
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.157859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Toll Signaling and Inflammation by β-Arrestin and the SUMO Protease Ulp1

Abstract: The Toll signaling pathway has a highly conserved function in innate immunity and is regulated by multiple factors that fine tune its activity. One such factor is b-arrestin Kurtz (Krz), which we previously implicated in the inhibition of developmental Toll signaling in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Another level of controlling Toll activity and immune system homeostasis is by protein sumoylation. In this study, we have uncovered a link between these two modes of regulation and show that Krz affects sumo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inappropriate activation of inflammatory responses or lack of immune signaling lead to serious conditions such as inflammatory diseases or immunodeficiency, respectively. Recent studies reveal that innate immunity is regulated by multiple factors, including sumoylation and the retromer complex, which fine tune immune activity (32,33). The present study clearly showed that glycosylation plays an important role in maintaining innate immune homeostasis and activation of immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Inappropriate activation of inflammatory responses or lack of immune signaling lead to serious conditions such as inflammatory diseases or immunodeficiency, respectively. Recent studies reveal that innate immunity is regulated by multiple factors, including sumoylation and the retromer complex, which fine tune immune activity (32,33). The present study clearly showed that glycosylation plays an important role in maintaining innate immune homeostasis and activation of immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The activation of the Toll pathway is also negatively regulated by serpins (13). Kurtz, a ␤-arrestin in Drosophila, negatively controls Toll signaling and systemic inflammation at the level of sumoylation (14). A very recent report demonstrates that Drosophila Pellino functions as a negative regulator by targeting MyD88 for ubiquitination and degradation in Toll-mediated signaling (15).…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Drosophila, Kurtz inhibits MAPK and Toll signaling during development (24). Another study connected Kurtz activity to sumoylation and found that Kurtz negatively controls Toll signaling and systemic inflammation at the level of sumoylation in Drosophila, although the mechanism was not clear (14). Therefore, mammalian ␤arrs and Drosophila Kurtz both downregulate NF-B signaling, but in different ways.…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore a mutation in Krz and Ulp1 causes similar dose dependent synergistic effects providing grounds for the two proteins involvement in same pathway. The altered levels of Krz can affect the deconjugation ability of Ulp1 so is involved in controlling systemic inflammation and toll signalling at SUMOylation level (Anjum et al, 2013). As the interaction between β-arrestin and SENP1 is conserved it can be suspected that the control mechanism might be similar in other organisms.…”
Section: Sumoylation and Inflammatory Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the interaction between β-arrestin and SENP1 is conserved it can be suspected that the control mechanism might be similar in other organisms. This will be of interest to see whether mammalian β -arrestins have role in Toll/NFkB signalling regulation (Anjum et al, 2013 RelA, is involved in NFkB heterodimer formation, nuclear translocation and activation. A recent report of the negative regulation of PIAS3 mediated SUMOylation of RelA subuunit of NFkB is surfaced unearthing the biochemical mechanism of transcriptional suppression (Liu et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%