1995
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.1995.11515309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of tomato fruit size by plant density and truss thinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 4.6, 4.9, 4.4, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.7 under no cover and 4.1, 3.9, 4.1, 4.1, 3.3, 2.6 and 2.8 under 83% shading (Wada et al, 2006). Fruits load affected sink strength (Heuvelink and Buiskool, 1994), and then fruits yield (Cockshull and Ho, 1995;Heuvelink, 1997). Under the condition of this experiment, the number of fruit set did not have significant difference by shading in most crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…1, 4.6, 4.9, 4.4, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.7 under no cover and 4.1, 3.9, 4.1, 4.1, 3.3, 2.6 and 2.8 under 83% shading (Wada et al, 2006). Fruits load affected sink strength (Heuvelink and Buiskool, 1994), and then fruits yield (Cockshull and Ho, 1995;Heuvelink, 1997). Under the condition of this experiment, the number of fruit set did not have significant difference by shading in most crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Hanna (2009) determined, that cluster thinning to three fruits instead to four significantly increased total marketable yield, reduced cull yield, and increased fruit mass. Cockshull and Ho (1995) similarly reported, that 30% fruit removal from the first three clusters resulted in increased fruit mass and reduced cull. In contrast to the reports for standard tomato varieties, cluster thinning of cherry tomatoes in our study resulted in approx.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Removal or damage of immature trusses on mature tomato plants induces a compensatory shift in yield within trusses located directly above and below those damaged (Slack and Calvert, 1977;Horridge and Cockshull, 1998). Similarly, removal of individual flowers within a truss can initiate compensatory weight increases within the remaining fruit (Cockshull and Ho, 1995). No evidence was found in the present study to suggest that depression in yield components resulting from exposure of the 3rd truss to O 3 were offset by compensatory increases in the weight or number of fruit borne on the 2nd truss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%