2011
DOI: 10.4161/hv.7.1.14527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory and policy issues for T1DM immunotherapy

Abstract: To cite this article: Alexander Fleming (2011) Regulatory and policy issues for T1DM immunotherapy, Human Vaccines, 7:1, 50-55,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for clinical and biostatistical reasons, measurement of a reliable change in group mean C-peptide levels in a small group of participants in less than 6 months is extremely difficult even if the underlying efficacy is high (27). Additionally, if all other factors were equal, efficacy would be easier to measure in children because, due to generally more intense autoimmunity, their C-peptide decline is more rapid than those of adults (25).…”
Section: Regulatory Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for clinical and biostatistical reasons, measurement of a reliable change in group mean C-peptide levels in a small group of participants in less than 6 months is extremely difficult even if the underlying efficacy is high (27). Additionally, if all other factors were equal, efficacy would be easier to measure in children because, due to generally more intense autoimmunity, their C-peptide decline is more rapid than those of adults (25).…”
Section: Regulatory Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to trials that evaluate glucose-lowering therapies and use HbA1c as the primary endpoint, trials aimed at T1D autoimmunity evaluate the treatment’s effect on the decline in endogenous insulin secretion as reflected by stimulated C-peptide levels [ 6 ]. Because of the high variability in stimulated baseline C-peptide levels, these trials must be longer and larger than typical trials with HbA1c as the endpoint [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite huge unmet clinical need for therapies specifically approved for T1D and defined regulatory pathways for T1D indications [ 8 , 16 , 17 ], to date (and for a variety of reasons) no drug remains in Phase 3 development. Four drugs reached that stage, GAD65 (Diamyd), DiaPep277 (Andromeda), otelixizumab (GlaxoSmithKline), and teplizumab (Lilly/MacroGenics), but all have gone back to Phase 2 or have been discontinued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%