1993
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1993.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory aspects of esterase 6 activity variation in sibling Drosophila species

Abstract: Esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana is produced in several life stages and diverse tissues, but the major pulse of expression is in the sperm ejaculatory duct of adult males. Comparison of EST6 activity levels among several lines of D. mauritiana transgene are lower than those of either parental species, suggesting that not all the promoter elements relevant to these aspects of expression are included in the transferred DNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is that selection for preferred codon usage has become stronger in D. simulans since its divergence from D. melanogaster. The est-6 gene product is, in fact, found at higher levels in D. simulans homogenates at certain stages of the life cycle (Karotam and Oakeshott 1992). However, this may not reflect an increase in expression in D. simulans; it could also reflect a decrease in D. melanogaster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One possibility is that selection for preferred codon usage has become stronger in D. simulans since its divergence from D. melanogaster. The est-6 gene product is, in fact, found at higher levels in D. simulans homogenates at certain stages of the life cycle (Karotam and Oakeshott 1992). However, this may not reflect an increase in expression in D. simulans; it could also reflect a decrease in D. melanogaster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Most of the species in these subgenera expresses Est-6 in the male ejaculatory ducts although its activity differs between species (Oakeshott, Healy & Game, 1990). Several studies correlate EST-6 with another b-esterases of Drosophila, suggesting a possible homology between them (Morton & Singh, 1985, Brady, Richmond & Oakeshott, 1990Karotam & Oakeshott, 1993;Oakeshott et al, 2001). Brady, Richmond and Oakeshott (1990) and Brady and Richmond (1992) described a duplication model to explain the origin of the Est-5A and Est-5B genes in D. pseudoobscura and Est-P, named as EST-7 to Dumancic et al (1997) and Est-6 in D. melanogaster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using these tests, the esterases in the gels are basically classified as carboxylesterases, cholinesterases, arylesterases and acetylesterases. According to Oakeshott et al (1993), carboxylesterases are inhibited by the organophosphorous insecticide malathion which blocks their visualization in the gels; cholinesterases are inhibited by both the organophosphorous insecticides and eserine sulphate; arylesterases are inhibited by sulphydrylic agents (such as p-Chloromercuribenzoate); and acetylesterases are not inhibited by the mentioned substances.…”
Section: Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Drosophila, these genes have been extensively used in studies of species in the melanogaster subgroup (Cohn & Moore, 1988;Laurie et al, 1990;Wu, Mote & Brennan, 1990), in the mulleri complex of the repleta group (Fischer & Maniatis, 1988) and also in the Hawaiian picturewinged species (Brennan, Wu & Berry, 1988;Wu, Mote & Brennan, 1990;Fang & Brennan, 1992). In addition to information on the tissue-and stagespecific variation of expression and on the control mechanisms at the molecular level, ontogenetic studies on enzyme systems of close species may also be valuable for understanding basic changes which occurred during evolution within a species group (Prakash & Reddy, 1978;Oakeshott et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%