2017
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory behavior and frontal activity: Considering the role of revised‐BIS in relative right frontal asymmetry

Abstract: Essential to human behavior are three core personality systems: approach, avoidance, and a regulatory system governing the two motivational systems. Decades of research has linked approach motivation with greater relative left frontal-cortical asymmetry. Other research has linked avoidance motivation with greater relative right frontalcortical asymmetry. However, past work linking withdrawal motivation with greater relative right frontal asymmetry has been mixed. The current article reviews evidence suggesting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
85
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(258 reference statements)
5
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of higher Regulatory Capacity/Orienting predicting lower initial power levels in the right hemisphere (thus, greater activation) is consistent with Gartstein et al () results, indicating greater Regulatory Capacity/Orienting was associated with relative right frontal activation in the context of an arm restraint task at 10 months. This pattern of results is also in line with a recently offered revision of the Behavioral Inhibition System definition (Gable, Neal, & Threadgill, ), which describes this system and the associated right frontal EEG asymmetry as linked with self‐regulation. It should be noted that none of the temperament/latent change score associations emerged as statistically significant, or approaching significance, in the parietal power model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The finding of higher Regulatory Capacity/Orienting predicting lower initial power levels in the right hemisphere (thus, greater activation) is consistent with Gartstein et al () results, indicating greater Regulatory Capacity/Orienting was associated with relative right frontal activation in the context of an arm restraint task at 10 months. This pattern of results is also in line with a recently offered revision of the Behavioral Inhibition System definition (Gable, Neal, & Threadgill, ), which describes this system and the associated right frontal EEG asymmetry as linked with self‐regulation. It should be noted that none of the temperament/latent change score associations emerged as statistically significant, or approaching significance, in the parietal power model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The finding that dream anger (a high approach negative affect), but not dream interest (a high approach positive affect), was related to FAA corroborates the theory that both state and trait FAA reflect supervisory control (47,48), rather than affective valence or motivational direction. As such, individuals with reduced right PFC activity (as indicated by more alpha power) may be less able to regulate (i.e., inhibit) strong affective states, such as anger, not only during wakefulness but also during dreaming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As a result, the predominant view holds that FAA reflects motivational direction independent of valence: left frontal activity is related to approach-related affective states and traits (e.g., elation, anger), whereas right-sided activity is associated with withdrawal-related affective states and traits (e.g., fear, anxiety) (39). However, whereas evidence regarding the association between left frontal activity and high approach (positive and negative) affect is rather consistent, there is much less consensus regarding the relationship between right frontal activity and withdrawal-related affect (36,47). As a result, it was recently proposed that FAA reflects supervisory or regulatory control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moderation effect may be a result of the involvement of relatively greater left or reduced right prefrontal activity with behaviors like impulsivity, a characteristic that can distinguish between suicidal and non-suicidal patients with MDD [65][66][67]. Gable et al [68] also proposed that the right frontal cortex is associated with the regulation and supervision of the motivational systems; thus, its hypoactivity indicates deficits of inhibitory control. Therefore, relatively greater left prefrontal activation compared with right may reflect reduced cognitive control or greater impulsivity, which may lead to greater suicidal ideation among patients with MDD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%