Regulatory Challenges in Realizing Integrated Coastal Management—Lessons from Germany, Costa Rica, Mexico and South Africa

Abstract

Integrated coastal management (ICM) has been considered worldwide to be a suitable approach to realizing comprehensive schemes to protect or develop coastal regions. A complex regulatory system stretching from international to local levels provides a framework for ICM practices. This raises the question whether and to what extent ICM practices have been supported by legal and policy frameworks at the international and national levels in different settings in both developed and developing countries. This paper examines four case studies in Germany, Costa Rica, Mexico and South Africa. Two research methods were used. First, a document-based analysis was conducted in two parts: a literature review of the content of ICM, and a policy and law analysis of the jurisdictions of the four case studies and at the international level (i.e., treaties and declarations). Second, a qualitative analysis was conducted based on in-depth interviews involving 21 decisionmakers representing all the case studies. With a view to enhance the effective use of international and national legal and policy instruments and their implementation in a more local site specific context, this study considers four principles currently guiding ICM practices: (i) incorporation of international instruments’ principles in national legal and policy frameworks, (ii) participation, (iii) sustainable development and (iv) monitoring. An I-P-S ((I) incorporation of international instruments’ principles in national frameworks, (P) participation (S) sustainable development) diagram is used for an integrative assessment of ICM and indicates directions for further improvements at the case study sites. The embeddedness of ICM into national legal and policy frameworks is a success factor for ICM, however, it is often limited due to a lack of implementation. Furthermore, ICM can easily be jeopardized if ICM is allocated a marginalized position.

Does green intellectual capital spur corporate environmental performance through green workforce?

“…Several other motivators may act as a reason for the adoption of environmental management initiatives (Raut et al, 2017). Particularly, stakeholders' pressures Yu et al, 2017), and international regulations (Quesada et al, 2018) have diverted the attention of firms towards the creation of an environmental management system (EMS). Organizations are now using environmental protection techniques.…”

Human Resource Best Practices Towards Organisational Competitiveness Case Study of a Bahraini Oil Sector State-Owned Enterprise

“…However, organisations have different motivators to encourage their employees with sustainable practices (Raut, Narkhede, & Gardas, 2017). The organisations mainly work to maintain ease among their employees from the impacts that occurred due to environmental and social international contracts surrounded by regulatory frameworks of different groups, continents, the United Nations, and other bodies that inspire and circulate globally (Menezes, Filho, & Drigo, 2017;Gençay, Birben, & Durkaya, 2018;Kanstrup, Swift, Stroud, & Lewis, 2018;Quesada, Klenke, & Mejía-Ortíz, 2018).…”

Global Review of ICZM in Mexico

“…The ICZM analysis through the Decalogue Quesada et al (2018) notes that Mexico currently faces obstacles in implementing ICZM practices, namely the lack of adequate legal and policy frameworks for ICZM and the struggle to enforce existing ICM laws and policies (Table 3). It is therefore essential that Mexico places a stronger political emphasis on implementing a robust policy and legal framework for ICZM, in addition to maintaining strong enforcement measures.…”