2014
DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2015.980944
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel

Abstract: The field of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has experienced significant growth in the past 15 years. One of the tES techniques leading this increased interest is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Significant research efforts have been devoted to determining the clinical potential of tDCS in humans. Despite the promising results obtained with tDCS in basic and clinical neuroscience, further progress has been impeded by a lack of clarity on international regulatory pathways. We therefore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
170
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(120 reference statements)
6
170
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding how endogenous EFs could guide cell migration and how an applied EF could potentially be leveraged to modulate this process provide a rationale for new therapeutics. For example, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown clinical benefits for central nervous system diseases (Fregni et al, 2015) and was able to promote cathodal accumulation of endogenous neural stem cells (Rueger et al, 2012). As more is learned about the role of bioelectricity on cell function it is likely that new opportunities for interventions will emerge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how endogenous EFs could guide cell migration and how an applied EF could potentially be leveraged to modulate this process provide a rationale for new therapeutics. For example, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown clinical benefits for central nervous system diseases (Fregni et al, 2015) and was able to promote cathodal accumulation of endogenous neural stem cells (Rueger et al, 2012). As more is learned about the role of bioelectricity on cell function it is likely that new opportunities for interventions will emerge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few minutes of stimulation can induce after-effects, which reflect calcium (Ca + )-dependent plastic changes mediated by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R), thus resembling long-term-potentiation (LTP)-and long-term-depression (LTD)-like plasticity (Liebetanz, Nitsche, Tergau, & Paulus, 2002;Nitsche, Fricke, et al, 2003;Nitsche et al, 2004). Depolarisation is typically achieved via "anodal" stimulation, whereas 4 hyperpolarisation typically follows "cathodal" stimulation (Fregni et al, 2015). In the context of tDCS, "polarity" refers to the polarity of the electrode positioned over the target region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tDCS was delivered through a TCT Research tDCS 1ch stimulator (2012 TCT Research Limited, Hong Kong) and 2 5 by 5 cm rubber-sponge electrodes. Parameters were set at: 2mA intensity, 10 minutes duration, with a 15 second ramping up/down period at the start and end of the stimulation (cathodal stimulation) (Fregni et al 2014). The sham condition uses the same parameters but the stimulator automatically turns off current after 30 seconds.…”
Section: Participants and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%