Regulatory issues in blockchain technology

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the key regulatory challenges impacting blockchains, innovative distributed technologies, in the European Union (EU) and the USA. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative perspective underpins the study. This paper relies on primary data from applicable statutes and secondary data from the public domain including relevant case study insights. Findings The smart regulatory hands-off approach adopted in the EU and the USA to a large extent bodes well for future innovative contributions of blockchains in the financial services and related sectors and toward enhanced financial inclusiveness. Practical implications The paper’s findings provide support for blockchain technology to advance with minimum regulatory brakes for greater value-adding and efficiency advancement, especially for financial services, thereby expanding accessibility and therefore financial inclusiveness. Originality/value This paper helps to draw greater attention to the technology underpinning virtual currencies. It also highlights other economic potentials flowing from blockchain advancement.

A Proposed Supply Chain Model of Blockchain Technology-Based in Automotive Component Industry

“…Blockchain Technology facilitates all processes in supply chain management that comply with the regulation, distribution, and shared-Blockchain characteristics. These ensure compliance in any activities of industry (Yeoh, 2017…”

Early Regulations of Distributed Ledger Technology/Blockchain Providers: A Comparative Case Study

“…In the financial sector, the implications of cryptocurrencies and also smart contracting were quickly understood also with regard to their quality to eliminate the need for services from central counterparties such as banks [14]. Forced by the success of unregulated cryptocurrencies and other DLT-based financial technology (FinTech) services, which had grown to a sizable global economic entity by the mid of the second decade of the 21 st century, lawmakers and regulators around the world began to investigate the options for regulating the novel phenomena for reasons of gaining control over DLT-based money flows (in terms of anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing interests) as well as for establishing baseline security and protection for investors and investments [3,7,19,21,24,34].…”

Robust Statistical Normality Transformation method with Outlier Consideration in Bitcoin Exchange Rate Analysis

“…This cryptocurrency gains its popularity as a means of settling e A Bitcoin transaction was introduced based on cryptographic, allowing two parties to transact directly with each other withou need for a trusted third party. This transaction routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers (Nakamoto, 2009) that underlie bitcoincryptocurrency in one sense, are nothing more than a modernizing sense, are novel and disruptive (Yeoh, 2017).…”