2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19644-7_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory Model for AAL

Abstract: In this work, authors define a set of principles that should be contained in context-aware applications (including biometric sensors) to accomplish the legal aspect in Europe and USA. Paper presents the necessity to consider legal aspect, related with pri-vacy or human rights, into the development of the incipient context based services. Clearly, context based services and Ambient Intelligence (and the most promising work area in Europe that is Ambient Assisted Living, ALL) needs a great effort in research new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a full description of the AAL domain in which the identification system has been used, see [37][38][39] describ-ing the AAL system and giving some illustrative examples. Our aim was to build an identification system into these applications, and we conducted a legal analysis of requirements [40].The legal analysis governed by privacy-by-design rules led to the development of an identification system capable of identifying user membership of a pre-defined class but avoiding personal identification.…”
Section: Privacy By Design In a Face Recognition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a full description of the AAL domain in which the identification system has been used, see [37][38][39] describ-ing the AAL system and giving some illustrative examples. Our aim was to build an identification system into these applications, and we conducted a legal analysis of requirements [40].The legal analysis governed by privacy-by-design rules led to the development of an identification system capable of identifying user membership of a pre-defined class but avoiding personal identification.…”
Section: Privacy By Design In a Face Recognition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others propose technology-specific principles: Abdul-Ghani and Konstantas (2019), Perera et al (2016), Perera et al (2020) and the UK Government (Department for Digital Culture Media & Sport, 2018) 'Secure by Design' for IoT devices, Sedenberg et al (2016) for robots, Pedraza et al (2011Pedraza et al ( , 2013 for facial recognition systems, Pinkas (2016) for eID systems, and Vanezi et al ( 2019) for e-learning platforms. We excluded all of these from further analysis because we are looking for generally applicable privacy attributes.…”
Section: Privacy By Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%