Keywords: CYP27B1 r CYP24A1 r DCs r Macrophages r Vitamin D Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site
IntroductionThe capacity of vitamin D metabolites to modulate macrophage and DC function has been subject to extensive research interest in light of the association of vitamin D deficiency with a broad spectrum of immunological and infectious diseases. This gives Correspondence: Dr. Mahdad Noursadeghi e-mail: m.noursadeghi@ucl.ac.uk way to the potential for vitamin D supplementation [1][2][3][4] or ex vivo conditioning of DCs with vitamin D for cell therapy strategies [5]. Vitamin D is synthesized from 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin following exposure to ultraviolet B radiation and thermal isomerisation, or replenished by dietary intake. It is 25-hydroxylated in the liver to form 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), which is in * These authors contributed equally to this work.
Results
25[OH]D is not functionally activated during monocyte differentiation to immature DCsWe first compared the activation of 25[OH]D during monocyte differentiation into macrophages and immature DCs. Conventional cell culture media in this model are vitamin D deficient (Fig. 1A) (Fig. 1B). This was also associated with upregulation of the prototypic vitamin D-inducible gene cathelicidin (CAMP) in macrophages (Fig. 1C) (Fig. 1C). Importantly, upregulation of DC-SIGN during monocyte differentiation to DCs was not affected by the presence of 1,25[OH] 2 D (Fig. 1D)
DCs show time-dependent increase in activation of 25[OH]D independent of CYP27B1 expression levelsWe confirmed previous observations [16] that expression of the vitamin D-activating hydroxylase CYP27B1 is significantly lower in DCs compared with MDMs at both transcript and protein levels ( Fig. 2A and B). In contrast, vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression was higher in DCs than MDMs ( Fig. 2A). Taken together, these data further support the hypothesis that 25[OH]D has no effect on DCs in the experiments described above, because of a failure to generate 1,25[OH] 2 D rather than an inability to respond to 1,25[OH] 2 D. We also confirmed that 24-h stimulation of DCs with LPS significantly increases transcript and protein levels of CYP27B1 ( Fig. 2B and C (Fig. 2D). However, there was no concomitant upregulation of CAMP (Fig. 2C) . Monocytes are typically differentiated to DCs over 4-7 days, therefore we considered the possibility that time in culture may confound comparisons between different studies. Interestingly, we did find 25[OH]D-dependent upregulation of CAMP gene expression in DCs that increased with time after at least 6 days in culture (Fig. 2E). This was not associated with any significant time-dependent increase in CYP27B1 expression (
DCs express truncated CYP27B1 transcriptsWe found that LPS stimulation was able to upregulate DC expression of CYP27B1 transcript to levels higher than that in MDMs ( Figs. 2A and C). However, the expression of CYP27B1 protein remains much lower in DCs compared with ...