2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034x.2007.00148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory processes interacting to maintain hepatic blood flow constancy: Vascular compliance, hepatic arterial buffer response, hepatorenal reflex, liver regeneration, escape from vasoconstriction

Abstract: Constancy of hepatic blood flow (HBF) is crucial for several homeostatic roles. The present conceptual review focuses on interrelated mechanisms that act to maintain a constant HBF per liver mass. The liver cannot directly control portal blood flow (PF); therefore, these mechanisms largely operate to compensate for PF changes. A reduction in PF leads to reduced intrahepatic distending pressure, resulting in the highly compliant hepatic vasculature passively expelling up to 50% of its blood volume, thus adding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
111
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the 2.5 m g/mL dose of angiotensin II can cause vasoconstriction in the adjacent and distant normal liver that is suffi cient to decrease the BF and BV in these regions without invoking the hepatic arterial buffer response ( 30 ) or inducing hepatic arterial vascular escape ( 31 ), which cause arterial vasodilatation in the normal liver parenchyma that is mediated by increased local levels of adenosine and nitric oxide, respectively. The combination of these two hepatic refl ex responses has been shown to give the normal liver the unique ability to escape from severe vasoconstrictive infl uences ( 30,31 ); this appears to have occurred at the higher angiotensin II doses, especially 50.0 m g/mL, in our study. Furthermore, only at the 2.5 m g/mL dose was the capillary permeabilitysurface area product of the tumor signifi cantly higher than that of the surrounding normal liver tissue.…”
Section: Practical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…These results suggest that the 2.5 m g/mL dose of angiotensin II can cause vasoconstriction in the adjacent and distant normal liver that is suffi cient to decrease the BF and BV in these regions without invoking the hepatic arterial buffer response ( 30 ) or inducing hepatic arterial vascular escape ( 31 ), which cause arterial vasodilatation in the normal liver parenchyma that is mediated by increased local levels of adenosine and nitric oxide, respectively. The combination of these two hepatic refl ex responses has been shown to give the normal liver the unique ability to escape from severe vasoconstrictive infl uences ( 30,31 ); this appears to have occurred at the higher angiotensin II doses, especially 50.0 m g/mL, in our study. Furthermore, only at the 2.5 m g/mL dose was the capillary permeabilitysurface area product of the tumor signifi cantly higher than that of the surrounding normal liver tissue.…”
Section: Practical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This hepatic arterial buffer response preserves a constant total hepatic blood flow with changes in portal blood flow. [16][17][18] Because hepatic arterial tone is regulated through local adenosine washout by intrahepatic portal venules, denervation of the liver during the transplant is not going to abate the hepatic arterial buffer response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In health, the portal vein provides ϳ80% and the hepatic artery ϳ20% of total liver blood flow (25). In cirrhosis, PBF decreases and HABF increases (26,27), such that as little as 10% of HBF may originate from the portal vein (28). To account for this unknown, we have modeled PBF to range between 10 and 80% of HBF and concordantly for HABF to range between 90 and 20% of HBF.…”
Section: Diabetes Vol 58 January 2009mentioning
confidence: 99%