1976
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(76)90040-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation of the brain-damaged survivor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this series the proportion of patients with traumatic anosmia increased from 3.8% for those with PTAs of an hour or less to 24.3% when PTA exceeded 1 week (table III). In confirmation of Evans et al (1972), it was found that PTA as estimated by the patients tended to be about four times the length of the time to return of coherent speech as stated in the hospital rec ords.…”
Section: Length O F Time O Ff Worksupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In this series the proportion of patients with traumatic anosmia increased from 3.8% for those with PTAs of an hour or less to 24.3% when PTA exceeded 1 week (table III). In confirmation of Evans et al (1972), it was found that PTA as estimated by the patients tended to be about four times the length of the time to return of coherent speech as stated in the hospital rec ords.…”
Section: Length O F Time O Ff Worksupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Determining the severity of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical for the effective management of individuals with TBI in both the acute stages and for later rehabilitation. Early indication of the severity of the injury and estimation of the length of the recovery period is important in planning rehabilitation programs, safe discharge, resource allocation, and predicting outcome (Evans, Bull, Devonport, Hall, Jones et al, 1977). An accurate and reliable construct to determine the severity of TBI is therefore essential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature PTA duration as an instrument for determining the severity of closed braindamage was introduced by Russell (1932). Since then, the duration of PTA has generally been considered to be a workable means of classifying the severity of brain damage, and at the same time a valuable prognostic factor (Brooks 1974, Jennett 1976, Evans et al 1977, Hannay et al 1979). However, experimental and methodological doubts about the reliability of this instrument have been expressed by other authors (Sisler and Penner 1975, Schacter and Crovitz 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%