Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible with an Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Three Implants: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

Mezzari, Leonardo Marcos; Primo, Bruno Tochetto; Bavaresco, Caren Serra; Caminha, Raquel D’Aquino Garcia; Rivaldo, Elken Gomes

doi:10.11607/jomi.7079

Cited by 5 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Cohen kappa result was 1. Table 1 lists the general information for the selected studies 1–9,33–36 . Table 2 displays the reasons for rejecting those 3 potential articles 37–39 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it may be useful to verify the clinical efficiency of fixed mandibular 3‐implant retained prostheses by comparing the pooled results of the present systematic review 1–9,33–36 to the data collected by the conference and other published studies. Some authors studied the use of four implants for the early loading of a fixed complete denture and observed a survival rate of 93.3% after 3 years 10 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Is the Fixed Mandibular 3‐Implant Retained Prosthesis Safe and Predicable for Full‐Arch Mandibular Prostheses? A Systematic Review

Brandão

Filho

Vedovato

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate implant and prosthetic survival rates of full‐arch rehabilitations retained by three implants in patients with edentulous mandibles. Materials and Methods This systematic review was developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. The focused question was: Are fixed mandibular 3‐implant retained prostheses safe and predicable for full‐arch mandibular prostheses? The Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were used to conduct the systematic search for clinical trials on fixed mandibular 3‐implant retained prostheses published between 1999 and 2020. Only English‐language studies that presented information on implant and prosthetic survival were included. Results A total of 302 studies were identified, of which 13 addressed the inclusion criteria. Additionally, 574 participants were included in these studies. As reported, 73 (4.57%) of 1596 implants failed, with a survival rate of 95.43%. In addition, the mean survival rate of the presented prostheses was 89.66%. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.09 mm. Conclusion Within the limitations of the present review, implant and prosthetic survival rates of fixed mandibular 3‐implant retained prostheses were similar to those of full‐arch mandibular prostheses retained by four or more implants. Further research exploring the topic is necessary.

show abstract

“…The Cohen kappa result was 1. Table 1 lists the general information for the selected studies 1–9,33–36 . Table 2 displays the reasons for rejecting those 3 potential articles 37–39 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Fixed Mandibular 3‐Implant Retained Prosthesis Safe and Predicable for Full‐Arch Mandibular Prostheses? A Systematic Review

Brandão

Filho

Vedovato

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Marginal bone loss was reported in six studies, varying between 0.13 and 1.62 mm after one year [4,7]. De Bruyn et al reported 2.1 mm of marginal bone loss after a 3-year follow-up, while others reported 0.73-2.65 mm 5 years after loading [5,25,26]. The study with the longest follow-up [22] obtained 0.9-1 mm marginal bone loss after 6 years.…”

Section: Marginal Bone Lossmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Antagonist dentition varied, with conventional complete dentures in three studies [1,26,28] and natural teeth, implants, or fixed tooth-supported restorations in seven studies [4][5][6][7]22,24,25]. Three studies did not report the type of antagonist dentition [23,27].…”

Section: Antagonist Dentition and Prosthetic Loading Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six studies did not register patient-reported outcomes [1,5,16,24,26,28]. One study simply asked patients if they were satisfied with treatment or not [23], two studies used the OHIP-14 and OHIP-Edent questionnaires respectively [22,27], and four studies reported varying satisfaction levels of 77-100% using other questionnaires [4,6,7,25 [1,24].…”

Section: Patient Reported Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Behavior and Complications of Mandibular Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Three Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sánchez-Labrador

Molinero‐Mourelle

Brinkmann

et al. 2021

Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to assess the clinical behavior of mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (ISFCDP) on three dental implants by analyzing implant and prosthetic survival rates, marginal bone loss, biological/technical complications, and patient-reported outcomes. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in the Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, complimented by a manual search in specialist journals for relevant articles published up to February 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale tool was used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed. The study included 13 articles with 728 patients treated with 2184 implants. A mean implant survival rate of 95.9% (95% CI: 94.6–97.3%) and a prosthetic survival rate of 97.0% (95% CI: 95.7–98.3%) were obtained over 1–6-year follow-up periods. Mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses on three dental implants would appear to be a viable option for restoring the edentulous mandible in comparison with mandibular ISFCDP on more than three implants. Further comparative studies are needed, with adequate protocols, as well as sufficient sample sizes and follow-up periods to confirm these findings.

show abstract

Quantity and Quality of Intraoral Autogenous Block Graft Donor Sites with Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Ataman-Duruel¹,

Duruel²,

Nares³

et al. 2020

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible with an Immediately Loaded Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Three Implants: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Is the Fixed Mandibular 3‐Implant Retained Prosthesis Safe and Predicable for Full‐Arch Mandibular Prostheses? A Systematic Review

Is the Fixed Mandibular 3‐Implant Retained Prosthesis Safe and Predicable for Full‐Arch Mandibular Prostheses? A Systematic Review

Clinical Behavior and Complications of Mandibular Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Three Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Quantity and Quality of Intraoral Autogenous Block Graft Donor Sites with Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About