Rehabilitation Professional and Patient Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Telerehabilitation offers an alternative healthcare delivery remotely in a patient’s environment at a lower cost, better accessibility, and equivalent quality to the standard approach. Several studies had examined the effectiveness of telerehabilitation inpatients with musculoskeletal disorders, and although there is evidence that it is at least equally effective as the standard care, the patient and rehabilitation professional satisfaction with the delivery method is not conclusive. A systematic review was conducted to study the patients’ and rehabilitation professionals’ satisfaction with telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. A search for relevant studies on 29 April 2021 was carried out in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS). The search terms included “telerehabilitation,” AND “satisfaction” AND “musculoskeletal disorders,” “telehealth,” “telemedicine,” “patient experience,” and “pain”. Fifteen eligible studies with 12,341 patients were included in this systematic review. A report was included if it (a) assessed the satisfaction of patients or professionals or both as one of the outcomes of a telerehabilitation intervention, (b) included adults 18 years and above with musculoskeletal disorders, and (c) is an intervention study using a quantitative approach. The quality of studies was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist tool developed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Most of the studies reported that patients were satisfied with both telerehabilitation and face-to-face intervention. However, few studies reported that patients were more satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face of intervention. Patients in one study had preferred the incorporation of telerehabilitation and face-to-face sessions. Two of three studies had reported overall satisfaction with telerehabilitation by the professionals. Overall, there is evidence that patients and rehabilitation professional are satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face consultation.

Telemedicine in the diagnosis and management of temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

“…According to Salazar Fernandez et al, 26 T‐Med allows accurate diagnosis and treatment for most TMD cases, shortens treatment time delays and lowers unnecessary costs for TMD patients. This was similar the findings of existing literature 27,28 . Ricea Chairunnisa et al promoted efficacy through self‐management by using jaw exercised videos with reminders 18 .…”

Therapeutic Exercise Interventions through Telerehabilitation in Patients with Post COVID-19 Symptoms: A Systematic Review

“…In comparison with traditional rehabilitation, only two studies carried out an analysis of efficacy [31,33], both of which position it as equally effective, and even superior in some parameters such as SGRQ [31]; although more studies are needed on this population, telerehabilitation already has a more than proven efficacy in other pathologies [18,43,44] as well as a much lower cost [45,46] and a good reception by patients [24,47]. These aspects make telerehabilitation a new trend in health sciences and, more specifically, boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic [48].…”

Digital physiotherapy is a satisfactory and effective method to improve the quality of life in Long COVID patients

“…Research has shown that patient satisfaction with an intervention is influenced by the results obtained, the patient–provider interaction, 21 and in the case of a digital intervention by the quality of the technology used. 63 Furthermore, the ability of professionals to adapt to new technologies and adopt them in their practice must be considered. More research addressing digital health training for both providers and patients is needed for better implementation.…”