Rehabilitation Profiles of Older Adult Stroke Survivors Admitted to Intermediate Care Units: A Multi-Centre Study

Abstract

BackgroundStroke is a major cause of disability in older adults, but the evidence around post-acute treatment is limited and heterogeneous. We aimed to identify profiles of older adult stroke survivors admitted to intermediate care geriatric rehabilitation units.MethodsWe performed a cohort study, enrolling stroke survivors aged 65 years or older, admitted to 9 intermediate care units in Catalonia-Spain. To identify potential profiles, we included age, caregiver presence, comorbidity, pre-stroke and post-stroke disability, cognitive impairment and stroke severity in a cluster analysis. We also proposed a practical decision tree for patient’s classification in clinical practice. We analyzed differences between profiles in functional improvement (Barthel index), relative functional gain (Montebello index), length of hospital stay (LOS), rehabilitation efficiency (functional improvement by LOS), and new institutionalization using multivariable regression models (for continuous and dichotomous outcomes).ResultsAmong 384 patients (79.1±7.9 years, 50.8% women), we identified 3 complexity profiles: a) Lower Complexity with Caregiver (LCC), b) Moderate Complexity without Caregiver (MCN), and c) Higher Complexity with Caregiver (HCC). The decision tree showed high agreement with cluster analysis (96.6%). Using either linear (continuous outcomes) or logistic regression, both LCC and MCN, compared to HCC, showed statistically significant higher chances of functional improvement (OR = 4.68, 95%CI = 2.54–8.63 and OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.52–5.87, respectively, for Barthel index improvement ≥20), relative functional gain (OR = 4.41, 95%CI = 1.81–10.75 and OR = 3.45, 95%CI = 1.31–9.04, respectively, for top Vs lower tertiles), and rehabilitation efficiency (OR = 7.88, 95%CI = 3.65–17.03 and OR = 3.87, 95%CI = 1.69–8.89, respectively, for top Vs lower tertiles). In relation to LOS, MCN cluster had lower chance of shorter LOS than LCC (OR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.23–0.75) and HCC (OR = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.19–0.73), for LOS lower Vs higher tertiles.ConclusionOur data suggest that post-stroke rehabilitation profiles could be identified using routine assessment tools and showed differential recovery. If confirmed, these findings might help to develop tailored interventions to optimize recovery of older stroke patients.

Predicting Discharge to Institutional Long‐Term Care After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

“…Another study defined rehabilitation complexity, incorporating age, prestroke function, comorbidity, severity, cognition, and disability with the presence or absence of a caregiver . A greater proportion of participants with higher rehabilitation complexity and a caregiver experienced long‐term care admission than of those with lower complexity and a caregiver ( P = .008), although this was no longer statistically significant when adjusted ( P = .14) (n = 384) …”

Longitudinal Stroke Recovery Associated With Dysregulation of Complement System—A Proteomics Pathway Analysis

“…The biology of post-stroke recovery is not well-understood, with patients exhibiting varying profiles based on factors such as their age, location of lesion, and degree of stroke damage (72). This study aimed to characterize common peripheral biological systems involved in post-stroke recovery by examining the longitudinal proteomics profile of EDTA plasma in stroke survivors.…”

How a Barcelona Post-Acute Facility became a Referral Center for Comprehensive Management of Subacute Patients With COVID-19

“…Inpatient services, mainly managed by specialists in geriatrics, are similar to high-performing skilled nursing facilities in the United States, with the constant presence of a physician. 16 They usually combine care for older adults with acute exacerbations of chronic conditions, 17 need for geriatric rehabilitation, 18,19 dementia and palliative care, 20 with goals to avoid admission, if possible, and to discharge only once appropriate.…”