2017
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reheating predictions in gravity theories with derivative coupling

Abstract: We investigate the inflationary predictions of a simple Horndeski theory where the inflaton scalar field has a non-minimal derivative coupling (NMDC) to the Einstein tensor. The NMDC is very motivated for the construction of successful models for inflation, nevertheless its inflationary predictions are not observationally distinct. We show that it is possible to probe the effects of the NMDC on the CMB observables by taking into account both the dynamics of the inflationary slow-roll phase and the subsequent r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(283 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to this, there is a unique nonminimal derivative coupling of the Standard Model Higgs boson to gravity which propagates no more degrees of freedom than General Relativity sourced by a scalar field, and reproduces a successful inflating background within the Standard Model Higgs parameters and, finally, does not suffer from dangerous quantum corrections [51]. The slow-roll conditions have been found [52], and the reheating temperature was obtained [53,54] (see also recent analyses in [55] and [56]). Furthermore, the cosmological perturbations originated at the inflationary stage were studied and the consistency of the results with observational constraints coming from Planck 2013 data were investigated [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In addition to this, there is a unique nonminimal derivative coupling of the Standard Model Higgs boson to gravity which propagates no more degrees of freedom than General Relativity sourced by a scalar field, and reproduces a successful inflating background within the Standard Model Higgs parameters and, finally, does not suffer from dangerous quantum corrections [51]. The slow-roll conditions have been found [52], and the reheating temperature was obtained [53,54] (see also recent analyses in [55] and [56]). Furthermore, the cosmological perturbations originated at the inflationary stage were studied and the consistency of the results with observational constraints coming from Planck 2013 data were investigated [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In principle the parameter α can also be a slowly varying function of N [38]. In addition the expansion (14), for some inflation models, may involve parameters of the potential [33]. Here we assume that α is a constant and absorb possible complicated behaviors in the arbitrary β(N ) function.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, going at next-to-leading order we could probe ∆N X ∼ 1 changes that could shed light on the pre-BBN cosmic history. For the Starobinsky model the expression (14) reads [33]…”
Section: The Starobinsky R 2 Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not clear from this scenario how reheating occurs or the Universe becomes radiation dominated after the end of inflation. For a non-minimal derivative coupling model, the reheating process after the slow roll and warm slow roll inflation are studied in [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%