1985
DOI: 10.1080/03740463.1985.10415447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reichenbach revisited: One, two, or three temporal relations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
7

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Formålet med naervaerende artikel, som er baseret på Vikner (1985), er at vise at det er muligt ved at indføre endnu et referencepunkt at opstille en analyse der etablerer en systematisk sammenhaeng mellem tempusformernes morfologi og semantik i en raekke sprog.…”
Section: Foreslået En Elements Of Symbolic Logicunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formålet med naervaerende artikel, som er baseret på Vikner (1985), er at vise at det er muligt ved at indføre endnu et referencepunkt at opstille en analyse der etablerer en systematisk sammenhaeng mellem tempusformernes morfologi og semantik i en raekke sprog.…”
Section: Foreslået En Elements Of Symbolic Logicunclassified
“…Denne analyse bliver forsvaret fx i Mikkelsen (1911: 431-443), Jørgensen (1964), Weinrich (1964), Vikner (1985, Thieroff (1992: 59), Kamp & Reyle (1993: 601) m.fl.…”
Section: Seks Temporaunclassified
“…I shall not go into a full discussion of the merits of the approach here (see for example Vikner, 1985, andEnc, 1987, for recent criticisms of this approach). I shall merely examine here how the contrast between will and be going to could be stated in Reichenbachian terms.…”
Section: The Reichenbach Approach To Tense Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If each distinct representation encodes different truth conditions, then to assume a different representation for the constructions in (43) and (44) runs counter to the proposal outlined above, in turn based on Haegeman (1981), that these constructions are truth-conditionally equivalent. Another option is to argue that the representations above (or alternative representations of the same type, see Hornstein, 1981;Vikner, 1985, and others) do not encode only the linguistically determined aspects of sentence semantics, which would be relevant at the level of logical form. One might propose that they also encode processing constraints which are not implemented at the sentence internal level but come into play at the level of contextualization of the utterance (cf.…”
Section: Tense Representation™mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogt hermed, og der findes selvfølgelig også uafhaengige argumenter, må dette tidspunkt altså også vaere tilstede i de andre, simple tempora som praeteritum eller praesens. Denne tilgang, som er "indirekte" forstået sådan, at den kun middelbart, nemlig via en omvej over referencetidspunktet, forbinder ytringstidspunktet med haendelsestidspunktet, er blevet modificeret og tilpasset flere gange, fx i Vikner (1985) og Vikner i dette nummer, og er også blevet anvendt i andre sprog, fx tysk (sml. Wöllstein-Leisten et al 1997: 77-92 (Reichenbach 1947: 287-298), har kunnet påvirke en forskningsretning i den grad.…”
unclassified