2018
DOI: 10.1177/1478210318813269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimagining complexity: Exploring organizational ambidexterity as a lens for policy research

Abstract: For years, policy implementation scholars have recognized the trend of school improvement policies converging on public schools in such a way that these policies create a paradox – policies aimed at school improvement have often been represented as in such a state of incoherence, that they have been unmanageable. This convergence of reforms asks educators to manage multiple demands – learning and implementing new reforms and ways of teaching, while also leveraging current resources and capabilities. The concep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foresight approaches impact on policy development by highlighting a complexity view that moves away from a linear understanding of policy development (Ansell et al, 2017;Miller, 2018;Warnke and Heimeriks, 2008). In the case of schooling, Bingham and Burch (2019) argue that there is a tension with improvement and narrow reform policies because they can add to the level of incoherence in schools as different change ideas are layered on top of current practice and other change ideas. They argue that researchers and policy makers should develop an environment for reform which embraces complexity and acknowledges that schools are required to be 'ambidextrous' (Bingham and Burch, 2019: 405) as they continue to maximise the value of current strategies whilst seeking ways to innovate.…”
Section: Designing a Logic For Future Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Foresight approaches impact on policy development by highlighting a complexity view that moves away from a linear understanding of policy development (Ansell et al, 2017;Miller, 2018;Warnke and Heimeriks, 2008). In the case of schooling, Bingham and Burch (2019) argue that there is a tension with improvement and narrow reform policies because they can add to the level of incoherence in schools as different change ideas are layered on top of current practice and other change ideas. They argue that researchers and policy makers should develop an environment for reform which embraces complexity and acknowledges that schools are required to be 'ambidextrous' (Bingham and Burch, 2019: 405) as they continue to maximise the value of current strategies whilst seeking ways to innovate.…”
Section: Designing a Logic For Future Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-interests preventing change include companies who are currently making money out of curriculum support (Law, 2014;Trilling and Fadel, 2009), or families and authorities who believe they are in an advantaged position under current systems which they do not want to put at risk (Law, 2014). A lack of alignment between system and classroom means that even ideas that are adopted as concepts of change may not lead to significant difference in practice (Bingham and Burch, 2019;Elmore, 1996;Law, 2014;Lee and Hung, 2016). To be effective, change needs to occur at both a policy and practice level (Elmore, 1996;Harris and Jones, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‫ا‬ ‫أ#'(‬ ‫/ف‬ ‫وظ‬ . ‫ا‬ ‫د‬P P/ ‫ا‬ ‫و‬P P‫ھ‬ ‫ل‬ P P 3 ‫ا‬ ‫د‬P P/ ‫ا‬ ‫‪P‬ذي‬ P ‫ل‬P ‫دا?‪P‬‬ ‫ن‬ ' P P ‫ا‬ %P P .P P ‫إ‬ ‫ت‬ P P1<# ‫ن‬ ‫و‬P P* (P P'# ‫‪P‬درة‬ P ‫ا‬ ‫ك‬P P' (P P'# ‫/م‬ P P ‫ا‬ P P ‫ا‬ P P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫خ‬ P P ‫وا‬ ‫ن،‬ ' P P ‫ا‬ ‫أداء‬ ‫ر‬ ‫و‬P P‫ط‬ P P, ‫ل‬ P P , ‫دور‬ ‫ن‬P P ‫ك‬ ‫ذ‬P P P P ،.P P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ Bingham and Patricia, 2018;Hoholm et al, 2018;Sollander et al, 2018 Gibson andBirkinshaw, 2004; ( ‫أن‬ ‫‪P‬ول‬ ‫‪P‬دور‬ .P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫را#‪.P‬‬ ‫ا‬ ‫,*‪P‬رة‬ ‫أن‬ (P ‫إ‬ ‫ب‬ ‫وا‬ ‫ت‬ 1 ‫ا‬ ‫ن‬ ‫د‬ ‫د‬ ‫ا‬ ‫3رض‬ ‫ط.‬ ‫ا‬ ./ ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬P .P Y P ‫ل‬P ‫ا‬ ) ‫‪P‬وارد‬ ‫ا‬ "P ‫و‬ . ' P P!…”
Section: ‫درا!‪P‬‬ ‫ت‬P ‫وأ‬ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“….P P1<# ‫‪P‬ود‬ P ‫و‬ (P P ‫إ‬ ‫ل‬P P:‫و‬ ‫ا‬ ‫م‬P P ،.P P ‫ر‬ ‫ا‬ ‫ر‬P P: .P P ‫ور‬ .P P ‫ر‬ ‫ا‬ ‫‪P‬وك‬ P ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬P ‫دا?‪P‬‬ .P P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ .P ‫را#‪P‬‬ ‫ا‬ ‫‪P‬ري‬ P*3 ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬ P P ‫ا‬ ‫رأس‬ ‫ت‬ P P ‫*و‬ .P P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫م‬ P P ‫اھ‬ ‫ن‬ P P .P P ‫طرد‬ ) ،‫ل‬P P ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬ P P ‫رأس‬ ‫‪P‬ري،‬ P+ ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬ P P ‫ا‬ ‫رأس‬ PP'* ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬ P P ‫ا‬ ‫رأس‬ ( .PP ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ .P ‫را#‪P‬‬ ‫ا‬ ‫ق‬PP ‫و‬ ‫ث‬PP ، ‫ا‬ ‫ق‬PP ‫أن‬ (PP'# ‫ف‬PP1‫و‬ .PP ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ .P ‫را#‪P‬‬ ‫م‬ P P ‫ا-ھ‬ ‫<ل‬P P? ‫ن‬P P ‫ك‬P P ‫وذ‬ ،.P P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬P ‫دا?‪P‬‬ ‫‪P‬ري‬ P+ ‫ا‬ ‫ل‬ P P ‫ا‬ ‫‪P‬رأس‬ P ‫م‬ P P ‫ا-ھ‬ ‫‪\P‬راء‬ P ' P P ‫ا‬ ‫ت‬ P P ‫ر‬ ‫و‬ ‫ن‬ Bingham and Patricia, 2018;Mardi et al, 2018;Miguel et al, 2018;Maximilian et al, 2018;Hoholm et al, 2018;Sollander et al, 2018;Tom et al, 2018;Popadic et al, 2016;Klinger, 2016;;Schreuders and Legesse, 2012;Carmeli and Hslev, 2009;Simsek, 2009;Raisch, 2009;Hess and Rothermel, 2008 ،‫ل‬PP P ‫ا7‬ ‫0<ل‬ PP P!< PP P ‫ؤھ'‬ PP P ‫ا‬ ‫ت‬ PP P * ‫وا‬ ‫‪PP‬رات‬ P ? ‫وا‬ ‫رات‬ PP P ' .PP P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫<ك‬ PP P ‫ا‬ ‫ك‬PP P ‫ذ‬ ‫ر‬ PP ‫وأ+‪P‬‬ ) Bingham and Patricia, 2018 ( ‫3‪P‬رص‬ ‫ا‬ ‫0<ل‬ P!‫ا‬ ‫أن‬ (P ‫إ‬ ‫‪P‬و,رة‬ ‫ا‬ ‫3‪P‬رص‬ ‫ا‬ %P (P'# ‫ل‬ P+ PP P ‫زا‬ ‫ا‬ (PP'# ‫ول‬PP: ‫ا‬ PP, .PP P ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫#د‬ PP!…”
Section: ‫ظ‬ ‫ا‬ ‫ط‬mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation