2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-020-01327-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimagining Merit and Representation: Promoting Equity and Reducing Bias in GME Through Holistic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence of reduced racial discrepancy in interview offers by eliminating a USMLE Step 1 cutoff score, 20 and of increased diversity in interviews and residency classes by initiating a holistic review process, focusing on applicants' diverse life experiences and commitments to the underserved. 11,32 These measures ensure that qualified candidates are not "screened out" based on outdated metrics and biased admissions policies. Every application should be reviewed and programs should move towards a mission-aligned selections process in order to promote equity.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of reduced racial discrepancy in interview offers by eliminating a USMLE Step 1 cutoff score, 20 and of increased diversity in interviews and residency classes by initiating a holistic review process, focusing on applicants' diverse life experiences and commitments to the underserved. 11,32 These measures ensure that qualified candidates are not "screened out" based on outdated metrics and biased admissions policies. Every application should be reviewed and programs should move towards a mission-aligned selections process in order to promote equity.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 , 27 This approach is also used to reduce reliance on measures tainted with bias, such as the USMLE Step 1. 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding psychiatry, a recent study comparing holistic and traditional reviews found that individuals identifying as URM were greater than twice as likely to receive an interview under holistic criteria than conventional criteria. 28 One downside to conducting a holistic review is that it is typically more time-consuming than traditional methods, especially with more applications. 28 , 29 Therefore, successful implementation of holistic review will require that programs have more support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Action items may vary widely and will be program specific, but could include de-emphasis on minimum USMLE examination scores or even interviewer blinding to USMLE examination scores, revision of applicant and/or interview scoring rubrics, and/or unconscious bias training for committee members. 37,79 Some programs have found that lowering or eliminating the minimum USMLE step 1 examination score requirement for an interview invitation, as well as placing less emphasis on AOA status and research experiences, may increase the number of UIM applicants invited to interview with and ultimately match into their program. 10,37 This strategy may be useful in helping programs to at least consider more UIM applicants for interview.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%