2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforced chitosan membranes by microspheres for guided bone regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7] Many studies have reported that chitosan has an excellent ability to form microspheres, membranes and bers, which gives it a signicant advantage over other absorbable membrane materials in the design of packaging structures. 8 However, chitosan is generally prepared using acetic acid as solventa method that brings a number of disadvantages, such as minimal thickness, peculiar smell and fragile nature of the lms at low concentration of chitosan, as well as easy drying and curl. Therefore, it is necessary to nd an alternative dissolution medium for chitosan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Many studies have reported that chitosan has an excellent ability to form microspheres, membranes and bers, which gives it a signicant advantage over other absorbable membrane materials in the design of packaging structures. 8 However, chitosan is generally prepared using acetic acid as solventa method that brings a number of disadvantages, such as minimal thickness, peculiar smell and fragile nature of the lms at low concentration of chitosan, as well as easy drying and curl. Therefore, it is necessary to nd an alternative dissolution medium for chitosan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Different strategies can be adopted to overcome these drawbacks. The development of new materials based on polymeric composites 5,9 or graphene/graphene oxide composites 10,11 are promising approaches, leading to the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblastic cells. An alternative strategy is the incorporation of osteostimulatory compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the membranes with chitosanhydroxyapatite microspheres, the number of cells attached and the filopodia extensions were higher compared with the simple chitosan microsphere membranes. Thus, the results indicate that these types of composite membranes could be suitable for bone defects regeneration (Huang et al, 2018).…”
Section: New Approaches For Chitosan-based Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The above-mentioned results are summarized in Table 4. hydroxyapatite-chitosan enhanced bioactivity, osteoblast differentiation and antibacterial properties, improved MC3T3 cells viability, pre-osteoblast attachment, and pseudopodia expansion; (Zima, 2018, Jahan et al, 2019 polycaprolactone-CMC enhanced MG-63 cell attachment and proliferation (Sharifi et al, 2018) chitosan-hydroxyapatite-resol improved metabolic activity, ALP activity, and protein adsorption for MG-63 cells and stimulated angiogenesis, enhanced osteogenic activity, and bioactivity in Albino rats (Shakir et al, 2018) chitosan-zirconium oxide/calcium zirconate/hydroxyapatite improved compressive strength and proliferation of OB-6 pre-osteoblasts (Gaihre and Jayasuriya, 2018) poly(L-lactic acid)-chitosan enhanced proliferation of mBMSCs and improved ALP activity; improved new bone formation in Sprague-Dawley rats (Chen et al, 2018) Incorporated chitosanhydroxyapatite microspheres into chitosan membranes enhanced MG63 attachment (Huang et al, 2018) 4.2. Alginate-based biomaterials…”
Section: New Approaches For Chitosan-based Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%