2009
DOI: 10.1080/13632460802598453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforced Concrete Exterior Waffle Flat Plate-Column Connections Subjected to Lateral Earthquake Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, first, a model for representing the moment transfer mechanism between plate and columns in exterior connections is presented. The model is an extension of a former one proposed by the authors that was validated with static tests. Second, the consistency of the proposed model with the results of the shake table tests is demonstrated.…”
Section: Design Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, first, a model for representing the moment transfer mechanism between plate and columns in exterior connections is presented. The model is an extension of a former one proposed by the authors that was validated with static tests. Second, the consistency of the proposed model with the results of the shake table tests is demonstrated.…”
Section: Design Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For exterior column‐plate connections, the solid slab is divided into 3 “virtual” independent beams in the direction of the seismic loading, following the model proposed by Benavent et al One beam (central beam) is centered on the axis of the column, and the other 2 beams (exterior beams) are located at either side of the central beam. The width b of the central beam is taken to be equal to 2 b L + c 2 , where c 2 is the transverse dimension of the column and b L is the length on each side of the column, where the longitudinal rebars of the plate in the direction of the seismic loading transmit the stress directly to the column through a strut‐and‐tie mechanism; it is calculated as explained in Benavent‐Climent et al The exterior beams transmit the moments from the plate to the columns through torsion on the spandrel beams, having width 0.5[ b s ‐(2 b L + c 2 )], where b s is the total width of the solid zone measured perpendicularly to the seismic loading. Therefore, these “virtual” beams are considered separately as frame elements to calculate the dissipated energy according to the procedure explained above.…”
Section: Test Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction 47 systems (Benavent-Climent et al, 2016;Benavent-Climent et al, 2018) under unidirectional seismic loading, as well as, the performance of structural sub-elements under pseudo-statics loadings such as slab-columns connections (Benavent-Climent, A, Cahís, & Catalán, 2008;Benavent-Climent, A, Cahis, & Catalan, 2009). One of the main goals of this Thesis is to investigate the response of a WFP system subjected to bidirectional seismic loading.…”
Section: Aims and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also true that the method is very dependent on the fraction of the total unbalanced moment ( ), which controls the contribution of shear and flexure to endure the unbalanced moment. Benavent-Climent et al (2009) analyzed the influence of this factor as well the ACI's capacity moment prediction for an exterior waffle-flat-plate-column connection, concluding that the code does not adequately predict the moment transfer capacity of the connection in regards to their results. In addition, they proposed a new method that holds that the moment is transferred from the plate to the column over two load paths.…”
Section: Exterior Drop Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation