2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2690-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcement learning-based flow management of gas turbine parts under stochastic failures

Abstract: For maintenance of gas turbines (GTs) in oil and gas applications, capital parts are removed and replaced by parts of the same type taken from the warehouse. When the removed parts are found not broken, they are repaired at the workshop and returned to the warehouse, ready to be used in future maintenance. The management of this flow is of great importance for the profitability of a GT plant. In this paper, we adopt a previously developed formalized framework of the part flow and reinforcement learning (RL) to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of model-free reinforcement learning (RL) to maintenance has been explored recently. Examples include on-policy RL (e.g., SARSA algorithm [21], [22]) proposed for a petroleum industry production system [23], for opportunistic maintenance of a fleet of military trucks [24], for minimizing the forced outage in gas turbine maintenance [25], for minimizing the average inventory level and This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: (Deep) Reinforcement Learning For Maintenance Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of model-free reinforcement learning (RL) to maintenance has been explored recently. Examples include on-policy RL (e.g., SARSA algorithm [21], [22]) proposed for a petroleum industry production system [23], for opportunistic maintenance of a fleet of military trucks [24], for minimizing the forced outage in gas turbine maintenance [25], for minimizing the average inventory level and This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: (Deep) Reinforcement Learning For Maintenance Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downtimes of the WTs due to PM and CM actions, Π P M and Π CM , respectively, are random variables obeying probability density functions f ΠPM and f ΠCM , respectively. The downtime of a PM action is expected to be shorter than that of a CM, as all the maintenance logistic support issues have already been addressed (Compare et al (2018)). The costs of the preventive and corrective maintenance actions on each WT are U P M and U CM , respectively.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barde et al [ 10 ] took multiple independent components in a military truck into account and found the optimal maintenance time for each component to minimize the system downtime by Monte Carlo RL. Compare et al [ 11 ] developed a framework by a Sarsa algorithm to find the best part flow management strategy of gas turbines consisting of repair and purchase actions in order to minimize the cost. In a more recent study, Bellani et al [ 12 ] proposed a Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) framework based on sequential decision-making and RL that, compared with the current practice of PHM, allows consideration of the maintenance and operation decisions’ influence on predicting the degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%