Reinforcement Learning for Object Detection in PET Imaging

Smith, Rodney; Ackerley, Ian; Wells, Kevin; Bartley, Lee; Paisey, Stephen J.; Marshall, C.

doi:10.1109/nss/mic42101.2019.9060031

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Al Walid et al [57] have used reinforcement learning for landmark localization in 3D medical images; they have introduced the partial policy-based RL, by learning optimal policy of smaller partial domains; in this paper, the proposed method was used on three different localization task in 3D-CT scans and MR images and proved that learning the optimal behavior requires significantly smaller number of trials. Also in [58], RL was used for object detection PET images. RL was also used for color image classification on neuromorphic system [59].…”

Section: Reinforcement Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

A holistic overview of deep learning approach in medical imaging

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical images are a rich source of invaluable necessary information used by clinicians. Recent technologies have introduced many advancements for exploiting the most of this information and use it to generate better analysis. Deep learning (DL) techniques have been empowered in medical images analysis using computer-assisted imaging contexts and presenting a lot of solutions and improvements while analyzing these images by radiologists and other specialists. In this paper, we present a survey of DL techniques used for variety of tasks along with the different medical image's modalities to provide critical review of the recent developments in this direction. We have organized our paper to provide significant contribution of deep leaning traits and learn its concepts, which is in turn helpful for non-expert in medical society. Then, we present several applications of deep learning (e.g., segmentation, classification, detection, etc.) which are commonly used for clinical purposes for different anatomical site, and we also present the main key terms for DL attributes like basic architecture, data augmentation, transfer learning, and feature selection methods. Medical images as inputs to deep learning architectures will be the mainstream in the coming years, and novel DL techniques are predicted to be the core of medical images analysis. We conclude our paper by addressing some research challenges and the suggested solutions for them found in literature, and also future promises and directions for further developments.

show abstract

Section: Reinforcement Learningmentioning

confidence: 99%

A holistic overview of deep learning approach in medical imaging

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Direct inference of Patlak parametric images in whole-body PET/CT imaging using convolutional neural networks

Zaker

Haddad

Faghihi

et al. 2022

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study proposed and investigated the feasibility of estimating Patlak-derived influx rate constant (Ki) from standardized uptake value (SUV) and/or dynamic PET image series. Methods Whole-body 18F-FDG dynamic PET images of 19 subjects consisting of 13 frames or passes were employed for training a residual deep learning model with SUV and/or dynamic series as input and Ki-Patlak (slope) images as output. The training and evaluation were performed using a nine-fold cross-validation scheme. Owing to the availability of SUV images acquired 60 min post-injection (20 min total acquisition time), the data sets used for the training of the models were split into two groups: “With SUV” and “Without SUV.” For “With SUV” group, the model was first trained using only SUV images and then the passes (starting from pass 13, the last pass, to pass 9) were added to the training of the model (one pass each time). For this group, 6 models were developed with input data consisting of SUV, SUV plus pass 13, SUV plus passes 13 and 12, SUV plus passes 13 to 11, SUV plus passes 13 to 10, and SUV plus passes 13 to 9. For the “Without SUV” group, the same trend was followed, but without using the SUV images (5 models were developed with input data of passes 13 to 9). For model performance evaluation, the mean absolute error (MAE), mean error (ME), mean relative absolute error (MRAE%), relative error (RE%), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM) were calculated between the predicted Ki-Patlak images by the two groups and the reference Ki-Patlak images generated through Patlak analysis using the whole acquired data sets. For specific evaluation of the method, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on representative organs, including the lung, liver, brain, and heart and around the identified malignant lesions. Results The MRAE%, RE%, PSNR, and SSIM indices across all patients were estimated as 7.45 ± 0.94%, 4.54 ± 2.93%, 46.89 ± 2.93, and 1.00 ± 6.7 × 10−7, respectively, for models predicted using SUV plus passes 13 to 9 as input. The predicted parameters using passes 13 to 11 as input exhibited almost similar results compared to the predicted models using SUV plus passes 13 to 9 as input. Yet, the bias was continuously reduced by adding passes until pass 11, after which the magnitude of error reduction was negligible. Hence, the predicted model with SUV plus passes 13 to 9 had the lowest quantification bias. Lesions invisible in one or both of SUV and Ki-Patlak images appeared similarly through visual inspection in the predicted images with tolerable bias. Conclusion This study concluded the feasibility of direct deep learning-based approach to estimate Ki-Patlak parametric maps without requiring the input function and with a fewer number of passes. This would lead to shorter acquisition times for WB dynamic imaging with acceptable bias and comparable lesion detectability performance.

show abstract