2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinstatement of extinguished fear by an unextinguished conditional stimulus

Abstract: Anxiety disorders are often treated using extinction-based exposure therapy, but relapse is common and can occur as a result of reinstatement, whereby an aversive “trigger” can reinstate extinguished fear. Animal models of reinstatement commonly utilize a Pavlovian fear conditioning procedure, in which subjects are first trained to fear a conditional stimulus (CS) by pairing it with an aversive unconditional stimulus (US), and then extinguished by repeated presentations of the CS alone. Reinstatement is typica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to determine, on a subject-to-subject basis, whether remission was achieved, as well as the overall remission rate for each experimental group, is a powerful addition offered by the present analysis. A perusal of the fear conditioning/extinction literature also suggests that our fear classification criteria are very much in line with the mean data for a number of studies (the cited studies are representative examples; the list is not exhaustive) from different laboratories, in which fear extinction, and some form of return of fear were reported [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Notably, reported means that were determined to be indicative of a significant return of fear were above 37%, and the means that were determined to indicate a significant fear reduction were below 30% (in males) [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: (A) Applying Fear Classification Criteria To Determine Remissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The ability to determine, on a subject-to-subject basis, whether remission was achieved, as well as the overall remission rate for each experimental group, is a powerful addition offered by the present analysis. A perusal of the fear conditioning/extinction literature also suggests that our fear classification criteria are very much in line with the mean data for a number of studies (the cited studies are representative examples; the list is not exhaustive) from different laboratories, in which fear extinction, and some form of return of fear were reported [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Notably, reported means that were determined to be indicative of a significant return of fear were above 37%, and the means that were determined to indicate a significant fear reduction were below 30% (in males) [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: (A) Applying Fear Classification Criteria To Determine Remissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As aversive or stressful life events affect relapse risk in anxiety related disorders (Wade et al 1993) this might be of particular clinical relevance. In support of this, a recent rodent study showed that the presentation of an unextinguished CS+ (predictive of the US during acquisition) can reinstate the CR to an extinguished CS+ (Halladay et al 2012). Earlier series of experiments (e.g., Rescorla and Heth 1975 [Exp.…”
Section: Type Of Cs and Us Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Thereafter, the rats are subjected to 60 extinction trials in 2 days by exposing them to conditioned stimuli alone. Subsequently, exposure to a non-extinguished conditioned stimulus reinstates the extinguished fear (Halladay et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fear-potentiated Startle Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%