2017
DOI: 10.1553/medievalworlds_no5_2017s70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was informed by the notion of continuity of an ecumenical imperium and the relevant need to reproduce and reassert a normative vision of a centralized imperial-political order, the boundaries of which were determined by the limits of enforceable imperial authority. 74 The careful choice of the texts of George the synkellos and Theophanes the Confessor as parts of his authoritative world history was explicitly intended to highlight the linear continuity of the Roman imperium within the framework of universal history. As already noted above, 75 these interconnected texts were delivered jointly in the Byzantine manuscript tradition since the second half of the ninth century, whereas usually only the last part of the text of George the synkellos was copied in those joint versions.…”
Section: History Writing and The East Roman Renovatio Imperiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was informed by the notion of continuity of an ecumenical imperium and the relevant need to reproduce and reassert a normative vision of a centralized imperial-political order, the boundaries of which were determined by the limits of enforceable imperial authority. 74 The careful choice of the texts of George the synkellos and Theophanes the Confessor as parts of his authoritative world history was explicitly intended to highlight the linear continuity of the Roman imperium within the framework of universal history. As already noted above, 75 these interconnected texts were delivered jointly in the Byzantine manuscript tradition since the second half of the ninth century, whereas usually only the last part of the text of George the synkellos was copied in those joint versions.…”
Section: History Writing and The East Roman Renovatio Imperiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stouraitis (2014: pp. 177-185), Stouraitis (2017), Chrysos (1996), Rapp (2008), Kaldellis (2009 2 ), Kaldellis (2012), Kaldellis (2017), Dagron (1968), Greatrex (2000), Χριστοφιλοπούλου (2004: p. 76): "Everyone, from the emperor down to the last citizen of the most distant frontier had a deeply rooted sense of Roman continuity, as is manifestly shown in Byzantine literature", Παπαδοπούλου (2015): per la determinazione della identità collettiva e della conoscenza di se stesso a Bisanzio tra il 11 o e 13 o secolo, Τσοπάνης (2010: pp. 147-148): Per l'Impero Bizantino come la continuità del' Impero Romano.…”
Section: L'imperatore Bizantinounclassified
“…Isso também está associado a uma reformulação do Império Bizantino ao longo de linhas mais obviamente gregas e com significativa mudança institucional. Outros argumentaram que a era crítica da transformação foi o prolongado reinado do 8 Cf, por exemplo, as seguintes abordagens, não necessariamente concordantes ou sobre a mesma temática: CAMERON, 2012;KALDELLIS, 2007KALDELLIS, , 2015bLEE, 2013;STOURAITIS, 2014STOURAITIS, , 2017 Recentemente, Gill Page (2008, p. 6) propôs "romanos bizantinos" como uma alternativa ao famigerado termo. Anthony Kaldellis (2015a), o principal revisionista na questão identitária bizantina, não vê necessidade em seu abandono, mas diz que é preciso que entendamos melhor ao que ele se refere.…”
unclassified