2011
DOI: 10.1057/bp.2011.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinventing the block vote? Trade unions and the 2010 Labour party leadership election

Abstract: Labour's electoral college chose Ed Miliband as the party's new leader on the basis of votes that were influenced by trade union activities. Some trade unions made a number of decisive interventions in the 2010 leadership election contest: they coordinated their nominations, canvassed intensely for their nominees (channelling considerable resources into their campaigns), and distributed ballots with strong recommendations in the same package as the voting slips. Such was the closeness of the election that, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They coordinated their nominations, restricted candidates' access to their members when campaigning and distributed ballot slips in the same packaging as partisan material. Arguably, such interventions allowed trade unions once again to shape the workings of the electoral college (for an account of Ed Miliband's election as Labour leader in 2010 along these lines, see Jobson and Wickham‐Jones, ; and Pemberton and Wickham‐Jones, ). Again, the failure of the electoral college to operate smoothly became the subject of discussion in the Collins Review that proposed the introduction of a single electorate to choose the leader based on members, individual affiliates who had opted in and registered supporters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They coordinated their nominations, restricted candidates' access to their members when campaigning and distributed ballot slips in the same packaging as partisan material. Arguably, such interventions allowed trade unions once again to shape the workings of the electoral college (for an account of Ed Miliband's election as Labour leader in 2010 along these lines, see Jobson and Wickham‐Jones, ; and Pemberton and Wickham‐Jones, ). Again, the failure of the electoral college to operate smoothly became the subject of discussion in the Collins Review that proposed the introduction of a single electorate to choose the leader based on members, individual affiliates who had opted in and registered supporters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the possible exception of Wilson in 1963 (Heppell, 2010a;Heppell, 2010b: 30-41) the 'expected' winner of all seven of these contests at the close of nominations (Healey had been the clear 'favourite' in 1980, but subsequently lost that status following Foot's belated decision to enter the race) invariably went on to win Carter, 1993, 1995;Drucker, 1976Drucker, , 1981Drucker, , 1984Heppell 2010b;Heppell and Crines, 2011;Stark, 1996: 118-120 (Dorey and Denham, 2011;Jobson and Wickham-Jones, 2011;Pemberton and Wickham-Jones, 2013;Quinn, 2012: 64-82). …”
Section: From Wilson To Corbyn: the Labour Partymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988, Kinnock was seen as the strongest candidate on all three of Stark's criteria ('acceptability', 'electability' and 'competence'), as was Smith in 1992 and Blair in 1994(Stark, 1996Drucker, 1984; Carter, 1993, 1995). In 2010, David Miliband was seen, according to the opinion polls, as the strongest candidate in terms of 'electability' and 'competence', but was clearly not 'acceptable' to the leaders of the 11 three largest trade unions (Dorey and Denham, 2011;Jobson and Wickham-Jones, 2011;Pemberton and Wickham-Jones, 2013). Of the two, Ed ultimately proved to be (marginally) more 'acceptable' to the Electoral College as a whole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%