2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b07744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinvestigation of the Unimolecular Reactions of CHF2CHF2: Identification of the 1,1-HF Elimination Component from Addition of :CFCHF2 to trans-2-Butene

Abstract: The recombination of ·CHF radicals in a room-temperature bath gas was used to generate CHFCHF* (where * indicates vibrational excitation) molecules with 96 kcal mol of vibrational energy. The CHFCHF* molecules decompose by four-centered 1,2-HF elimination and by three-centered 1,1-HF elimination reactions to give HF and either CHF═CF or :CFCHF, respectively. The 1,1-HF component was identified by trapping the :CFCHF carbene with trans-2-butene that forms 1-fluoro-1-difluoromethyl-2,3-dimethylcyclopropane. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several examples (C 2 D 5 CHF 2 , CD 3 CHFCl, CHF 2 CHF 2 ) demonstrate the relation between 2,1-DF and 1,1-HF elimination, and CD 2 ClCHFCl seems to fit the same pattern, even though HF and DF elimination reactions are only 10% of the total unimolecular reaction. The 1,1-HF/2,1-DF branching ratios are 0.3 to 0.4 for ⟨ E ⟩ = 90–96 kcal mol –1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several examples (C 2 D 5 CHF 2 , CD 3 CHFCl, CHF 2 CHF 2 ) demonstrate the relation between 2,1-DF and 1,1-HF elimination, and CD 2 ClCHFCl seems to fit the same pattern, even though HF and DF elimination reactions are only 10% of the total unimolecular reaction. The 1,1-HF/2,1-DF branching ratios are 0.3 to 0.4 for ⟨ E ⟩ = 90–96 kcal mol –1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Giving less weight to points below 1/ P = 0.2 gives a ratio of 1.2–1.1. Upon the basis of numerous studies, product alkenes from four-centered elimination of HX from haloalkanes do not retain sufficient vibrational energy for cis/trans isomerization, and ratios in Figure a are expected to be pressure-independent. The cis-isomers of CDClCDF and CDClCDCl are lower in energy by about 0.8 kcal mol –1 with equilibrium constants (cis/trans) of about 1.6 at 600 K. Because the transition states for 2,1-DX elimination resemble those of the alkene products, a cis/trans ratio of 1.4–1.2 would be expected for 2,1-DCl and 2,1-DF elimination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study of C 2 D 5 CHFCl provides additional examples of carbene:HX adducts. Low vibrational frequencies of the transition state enable 1,1-HX elimination reactions to compete with traditional 2,1-HX elimination reactions at high temperatures or high vibrational energies. For most chemical activation systems, the carbene product has sufficient energy to isomerize to an olefin. Several examples of 1,1-HF elimination reactions have been successfully characterized by experimental and computational studies. According to computational results, , hydrogen-bonded carbene:HF adducts with dissociation energies between 6 and 10 kcal mol –1 exist in the exit channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low vibrational frequencies of the transition state enable 1,1-HX elimination reactions to compete with traditional 2,1-HX elimination reactions at high temperatures or high vibrational energies. For most chemical activation systems, the carbene product has sufficient energy to isomerize to an olefin. Several examples of 1,1-HF elimination reactions have been successfully characterized by experimental and computational studies. According to computational results, , hydrogen-bonded carbene:HF adducts with dissociation energies between 6 and 10 kcal mol –1 exist in the exit channels. Calculated threshold energies for 1,1-HF elimination are a few kcal mol –1 higher than the enthalpy of reaction, and those calculated values are in accord with threshold energies derived from comparing experimental rate constants with statistical rate constants obtained from models of transition states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%