1997
DOI: 10.2307/494571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinvigorating the Teaching of History through Alternative Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the measures selected, it is suggested that Drake and McBride's (1997) analytical rubric for assessment in history be used because it portrays student performance relative to three distinct categories (knowledge, reasoning, and communication), allowing teachers to develop comprehensive evaluations of the learning that has occurred.…”
Section: Assessing Student Learning In Units Based On the Study Of Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the measures selected, it is suggested that Drake and McBride's (1997) analytical rubric for assessment in history be used because it portrays student performance relative to three distinct categories (knowledge, reasoning, and communication), allowing teachers to develop comprehensive evaluations of the learning that has occurred.…”
Section: Assessing Student Learning In Units Based On the Study Of Icmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gov) to more recent projects such as History Now (http://www.historynow.org). When asked to create digital products such as presentations, movies, Web sites, and podcasts (i.e., learn by creating digital products available to wider audiences), students have the opportunity to organize, re-present, and make public (visualize) their understandings, allowing for more meaningful assessments of their learning, among other benefits anticipated by constructivist theory (e.g., Drake & McBride, 1997). Thomas (2000) concluded his review of the PBL literature by calling for research that offered "evidence of the effectiveness of PBL in comparison to other methods" (p. 36) as a high priority.…”
Section: Technology In History Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, vastly different instructional strategies designed to consider problems of historical interpretation, develop analytical tools, critique sources, and learn how to construct historical interpretations (e.g., Mandell, 2008) are available to practitioners in K-12 settings. In general, they advocate increasing student achievement and enhancing the experience of learning history by promoting deeper understanding c.nd engagement in historical thinking (Caron, 2005;Ferster, Hammond, & Bull, 2006;Stearns, Seixas, & Wineburg, 2000). Theoretical frameworks such as constructivism (Brooks & Brooks, 1999: Fosnot, 2005Richardson, 2003) a::1d teaching strategies such as project-based learning (Blumenfeld, Soloway, l\1arx:, Krajcik, Guzdial, & Palincsar, 1991;Buck Institute for Education, 2003;l\1oursund, 2003) provide a conceptual structure with \Yhich to design learning experiences that can fulfi] these goals, and offer practical guidance for technology integration across the curriculum, including history in particular.…”
Section: Introduction and Purpose Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Berdasarkan pendekatan Understanding by Design, sebelum menentukan langkah-langkah pembelajaran, guru terlebih dahulu memastikan tujuan pembelajaran dan asesmennya. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa asesmen menjadi bagian yang sangat penting bagi untuk memastikan ketercapaian tujuan pembelajaran (Drake & McBride, 1997;Edmunds, 2006;Munazar & Qomarudin, 2021).…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan Kedudukan Dan Jenis Asesmen Pada Kuriku...unclassified