2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reirradiation of Large-Volume Recurrent Glioma With Pulsed Reduced-Dose-Rate Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] This involves spreading out a conventional radiation therapy dose into short pulses of dose with breaks in between. By example, a PLDR regimen may involve delivering a dose of 2 Gy as 10 pulses of 0.2 Gy, each 3 minutes apart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] This involves spreading out a conventional radiation therapy dose into short pulses of dose with breaks in between. By example, a PLDR regimen may involve delivering a dose of 2 Gy as 10 pulses of 0.2 Gy, each 3 minutes apart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable potential gains in modeled tumor control probability in cell lines derived from human glioma in his first reference 1 were not, however, translated into improved survival in PRDR treatment for recurrent glioma in his second reference. 2 In that study, median survival from initiation of PRDR was 5.1 months for Grade 4, 5.6 months for Grade 3, and 11.4 months for tumors initially classified as low-grade. These dismal survival rates are essentially the same as those for other experimental treatments, such as the eight recurrent glioma Phase II drug trials reviewed in Ref.…”
Section: Opening Statementmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…2 For PRDR re-treatment of locally recurrent breast cancer described in his third reference, 3 a trend toward higher local control was indeed found compared to re-treatment with electron beams in a 1978 study with a similar follow-up period, 92% versus 69%. The 17 patients of the study, however, was a number too small for meaningful statistical significance, and, furthermore, the acute toxicity rate was 23%, which is higher than the 8% reported for the electron-beam re-treatments.…”
Section: Opening Statementmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations