Rejuvenating clusters with ‘sleeping anchors’: The case of nanoclusters

Baglieri, Daniela; Cinici, Maria Cristina; Mangematin, Vincent

doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.09.003

Cited by 41 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Geographical proximity generates also other benefits for co-located actors because these hubs create economies of scale in services such as infrastructure and specialized labor. While previous empirical work found that the anchor role can be played by a large, incumbent high-tech firm (Baglieri and Cinici Mangematin, 2012) or a university (Feldman, 2003), our findings complements previous evidence by adding that private-public research centers can accelerate anchor model benefits, stimulating both the demand and supply sides of local markets for innovation, and efficiently channeling and orchestrating knowledge spillovers. Contrasting this experience, the Japanese nanotech knowledge production is widely dispersed among a huge number of large, incumbent firms, and reveals a different strategy that Japan is pursuing, that is, a deliberate movement away from a "anchor-tenant model" in favor of a higher actor variety, with the aim to leverage firms' alliance portfolios and access external patents.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Does the nano-patent ‘Gold rush’ lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan

2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Does the nano-patent ‘Gold rush’ lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan

2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…establishing common language portfolios in relation to KOs between OM and AS actors using the KOs of lean PMs and Lean Value Streams) and semantic knowledge sharing (developing shared meanings for insipient KOs) with relatively high levels of "amplified uncertainty" (Baglieri et al, 2012). The Lean KOs are seen as becoming more defined at the project progresses with jointly agreed Lean PM sets and Lean Value Streams being established and readily transferable amongst all of the actors involved (Letti et al, 2008).…”

Section: Mcgivern and Dopsonmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of Lean at the interface with between operations management and applied services within a large aerospace organisation: a boundary spanning perspective

McAdam

Galbraith

Miller

et al. 2016

Production Planning & Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Three of the member organisations that act as so-called anchor tenants were included in the selection (see Baglieri et al, 2012). This set of criteria sought to prevent a bias in the findings.…”

Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This may result in a negative lock-in that hinders cluster change as the cluster is too socially embedded (Engstrand and Stam, 2002). Finally, anchor tenants that play a key role in coordinating partnerships and setting up new initiatives may resist change in fear of upcoming rivals taking their positions (see Baglieri et al, 2012). This scenario could be even more problematic given the uneven distribution of power.…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because of the pressing need for the cluster to become financially independent, it will have to open up if it wants to attract new members. This could help the cluster increase its heterogeneity and capacity to evolve and adapt to environmental changes (Baglieri et al, 2012;Suire and Vicente, 2014). Besides, the fact that different anchor tenants now try to steer the cluster in a new direction may also help to rejuvenate the cluster (Baglieri et al, 2012).…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The role of the government in promoting and steering cluster development

Vernay

D’Ippolito

Pinkse³

2016

AMPROC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ｐ｡ｰ･ｲ＠ｴｯ＠｢･＠ｰｲ･ｳ･ｮｴ･､＠｡ｴ＠ｴｨ･＠ｄｒｕｉｄＱＶ＠ＲＰｴｨ＠ａｮｮｩｶ･ｲｳ｡ｲｹ＠ｃｯｮｦ･ｲ･ｮ｣･ｃｯｰ･ｮｨ｡ｧ･ｮＬ＠ｊｵｮ･＠ＱＳＭＱＵＬ＠ＲＰＱＶ＠＠＠＠ｔｨ･＠ｲｯｬ･＠ｯｦ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴ＠ｩｮ＠ｰｲｯｭｯｴｩｮｧ＠｡ｮ､＠ｳｴ･･ｲｩｮｧ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ､･ｶ･ｬｯｰｭ･ｮｴＺ＠ｔｨ･＠｣｡ｳ･＠ｯｦ＠｡ｮ＠･ｮ･ｲｧｹ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲａｮｮ･Ｍｌｯｲ･ｮ･＠ｖ･ｲｮ｡ｹｇｲ･ｮｯ｢ｬ･＠ｅ｣ｯｬ･＠､･＠ｍ｡ｮ｡ｧ･ｭ･ｮｴｍｔｓａｮｮ･Ｍｬｯｲ･ｮ･Ｎｖｅｒｎａｙ｀ｧｲ･ｮｯ｢ｬ･Ｍ･ｭＮ｣ｯｭｂ･｡ｴｲｩ｣･＠ｄＧｩｰｰｯｬｩｴｯｔｨ･＠ｙｯｲｫ＠ｍ｡ｮ｡ｧ･ｭ･ｮｴ＠ｓ｣ｨｯｯｬＬ＠ｕｮｩｶ･ｲｳｩｴｹ＠ｯｦ＠ｙｯｲｫｍ｡ｮ｡ｧ･ｭ･ｮｴ｢･｡ｴｲｩ｣･Ｎ､ｩｰｰｯｬｩｴｯ｀ｹｯｲｫＮ｡｣Ｎｵｫｊｯｮ｡ｴ｡ｮ＠ｐｩｮｫｳ･ｕｮｩｶ･ｲｳｩｴｹ＠ｯｦ＠ｍ｡ｮ｣ｨ･ｳｴ･ｲｉｮｮｯｶ｡ｴｩｯｮ＠ｍ｡ｮ｡ｧ･ｭ･ｮｴ＠｡ｮ､＠ｐｯｬｩ｣ｹｪｯｮ｡ｴ｡ｮＮｰｩｮｫｳ･｀ｭ｢ｳＮ｡｣Ｎｵｫ＠＠ａ｢ｳｴｲ｡｣ｴｏｶ･ｲ＠ｴｨ･＠ｰ｡ｳｴ＠ｴｷｯ＠､･｣｡､･ｳＬ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲｳ＠ｨ｡ｶ･＠｢･｣ｯｭ･＠｡＠ｰｯｰｵｬ｡ｲ＠ｰｯｬｩ｣ｹ＠ｴｯｯｬ＠ｴｯ＠ｩｮ｣ｲ･｡ｳ･＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｯｭｰ･ｴｩｴｩｶ･ｮ･ｳｳ＠ｯｦｲ･ｧｩｯｮｳ＠｡ｮ､＠ｴｯ＠ｳｴｩｭｵｬ｡ｴ･＠ｪｯ｢＠｣ｲ･｡ｴｩｯｮＮ＠ｔｨ･＠ｵｮ､･ｲｬｹｩｮｧ＠｡ｳｳｵｭｰｴｩｯｮ＠ｯｦ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｰｯｬｩ｣ｹ＠ｩｳ＠ｴｨ｡ｴ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴ＠｣｡ｮ･ｩｴｨ･ｲ＠ｦ｡｣ｩｬｩｴ｡ｴ･＠ｴｨ･＠､･ｶ･ｬｯｰｭ･ｮｴ＠ｯｦ＠｡＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｯｲ＠｣ｲ･｡ｴ･＠ｯｮ･＠ｦｲｯｭ＠ｳ｣ｲ｡ｴ｣ｨＮ＠ｓｯ＠ｦ｡ｲＬ＠ｬｩｭｩｴ･､＠｡ｴｴ･ｮｴｩｯｮ＠ｨ｡ｳ＠｢･･ｮｧｩｶ･ｮ＠ｴｯ＠ｨｯｷ＠ｴｨ･＠ｭ･ｭ｢･ｲｳ＠ｯｦ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲｳ＠ｲ･ｦｬ･｣ｴ＠ｯｮ＠ｴｨ･＠ｷ｡ｹｳ＠ｩｮ＠ｷｨｩ｣ｨ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴ＠ｭ｡ｹ＠ｩｮｦｬｵ･ｮ｣･＠ｴｨ･＠ｲｵｮｮｩｮｧ＠ｯｦｴｨ･＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲＮ＠ｔｨｩｳ＠ｰ｡ｰ･ｲ＠ｦｵｲｴｨ･ｲ＠｣ｯｮｴｲｩ｢ｵｴ･ｳ＠ｴｯ＠ｴｨｩｳ＠､･｢｡ｴ･＠｢ｹ＠｡､､ｲ･ｳｳｩｮｧ＠ｴｷｯ＠ｩｳｳｵ･ｳＮ＠ｆｩｲｳｴＬ＠ｩｴ＠･ｸ｡ｭｩｮ･ｳ＠ｴｯ＠ｷｨ｡ｴ･ｸｴ･ｮｴ＠｡＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｴｨ｡ｴ＠ｩｳ＠ｨｩｧｨｬｹ＠｡ｦｦ･｣ｴ･､＠｢ｹ＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴ｡ｬ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｰｯｬｩ｣ｹ＠ｩｳ＠｢･ｩｮｧ＠｡ｰｰｲｯｰｲｩ｡ｴ･､＠｢ｹ＠ｴｨ･＠ｭ･ｭ｢･ｲｳＮｓ･｣ｯｮ､Ｌ＠ｴｨ･＠ｰ｡ｰ･ｲ＠ｩｮｶ･ｳｴｩｧ｡ｴ･ｳ＠ｷｨ･ｴｨ･ｲ＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｩｳ＠ｦｵｮ｣ｴｩｯｮｩｮｧ＠｡｣｣ｯｲ､ｩｮｧ＠ｴｯ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴｳ＠ｩｮｴ･ｮｴＮｅｭｰｩｲｩ｣｡ｬ＠ｭ｡ｴ･ｲｩ｡ｬ＠ｩｳ＠､･ｲｩｶ･､＠ｦｲｯｭ＠｡＠｣｡ｳ･＠ｳｴｵ､ｹ＠ｯｦ＠｡＠ｆｲ･ｮ｣ｨ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲＮ＠ｂ･ｳｩ､･ｳ＠ｲ･ｳｵｬｴｩｮｧ＠ｦｲｯｭ＠｡＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｰｯｬｩ｣ｹｩｮｩｴｩ｡ｴｩｶ･Ｌ＠ｴｨｩｳ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｷ｡ｳ＠ｲ･｣･ｮｴｬｹ＠ｲ･ｱｵｩｲ･､＠｢ｹ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴ＠ｴｯ＠ｭ･･ｴ＠｡＠ｮ･ｷ＠ｳ･ｴ＠ｯｦ＠ｯ｢ｪ･｣ｴｩｶ･ｳＮ＠ｏｵｲ＠ｦｩｮ､ｩｮｧｳ｣ｯｮｦｩｲｭ＠ｴｨ｡ｴ＠ｩｴ＠ｩｳ＠､ｩｦｦｩ｣ｵｬｴ＠ｦｯｲ＠ｭ･ｭ｢･ｲｳ＠ｯｦ＠｡＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴＭｩｮｦｬｵ･ｮ｣･､＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｴｯ＠ｦｵｬｬｹ＠｡ｰｰｲｯｰｲｩ｡ｴ･＠ｩｴＮ＠ｗ･＠ｳｨｯｷ＠ｴｨ｡ｴｮ･ｷ＠ｰｯｬｩｴｩ｣｡ｬ＠ｯ｢ｪ･｣ｴｩｶ･ｳ＠｣｡ｮ＠､･ｳｴ｡｢ｩｬｩｳ･＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠｢ｹ＠ｰｵｴｴｩｮｧ＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｵｲｲ･ｮｴ＠ｰｯｷ･ｲ＠､ｩｳｴｲｩ｢ｵｴｩｯｮ＠ｩｮｴｯ＠ｱｵ･ｳｴｩｯｮ＠｡ｮ､ｴｨ｡ｴ＠ｩｴ＠｣｡ｮ＠｣ｲ･｡ｴ･＠ｩｮ｣･ｮｴｩｶ･ｳ＠ｦｲｯｭ＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲ＠ｴｯ＠ｲ･ｮ･ｷ＠ｩｴｳ･ｬｦＮ＠ｗ･＠｡ｬｳｯ＠ｱｵ･ｳｴｩｯｮ＠ｴｨ･＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲｳ＠｣｡ｰ｡｣ｩｴｹ＠ｴｯ＠｣ｨ｡ｮｧ･ｩｴｳ＠､･ｶ･ｬｯｰｭ･ｮｴ＠ｰ｡ｴｨＮ＠ｍｯｲ･＠ｧ･ｮ･ｲ｡ｬｬｹＬ＠ｷ･＠ｲ･ｦｬ･｣ｴ＠ｯｮ＠ｴｨ･＠ｧｯｶ･ｲｮｭ･ｮｴｳ＠｡｢ｩｬｩｴｹ＠ｴｯ＠ｩｮｦｬｵ･ｮ｣･＠ｴｨ･＠､･ｶ･ｬｯｰｭ･ｮｴ＠ｰ｡ｴｨｯｦ＠｣ｬｵｳｴ･ｲｳＮｊ･ｬ｣ｯ､･ｳＺｏＳＸＬＭ Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)The role of the government in promoting and steering cluster development: The case of an energy cluster AbstractOver the past two decades, clusters have become a popular policy tool to increase the competitiveness of regions and to stimulate job creation. The underlying assumption of cluster policy is that the government can either facilitate the development of a cluster or create one 'from scratch'. So far, limited attention has been given to how the members of clusters reflect on the ways in which the government may influence the running of the cluster. This paper further contributes to this debate by addressing two issues. First, it examines to what extent a cluster that is highly affected by governmental cluster policy is being appropriated by the members. Second, the paper investigates whether the cluster is functioning according to the government's intent. Empirical material is derived from a case study of a French cluster. Besides resulting from a cluster policy initiative, this cluster was recently required by the government to meet a new s...

show abstract

Rejuvenating clusters with ‘sleeping anchors’: The case of nanoclusters

Cited by 41 publications

References 55 publications

Does the nano-patent ‘Gold rush’ lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan

Does the nano-patent ‘Gold rush’ lead to entrepreneurial-driven growth? Some policy lessons from China and Japan

The role of Lean at the interface with between operations management and applied services within a large aerospace organisation: a boundary spanning perspective

The role of the government in promoting and steering cluster development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About