Rekonstruktive Eingriffe am Ellenbogen

Blauth, M.; Gösling, Thomas

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56417-8_6

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 218 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sie wird bei der Arthrodiastase über das normale Maß hinaus bis etwa zum Doppelten der normalen, radiologisch sichtbaren Gelenkspaltweite fortgesetzt [25]. Die symmetrische Distraktion des Gelenks soll ein posteriores oder anteriores "Impingement" verhindern, zu dem es bei alleiniger Distraktion humeral oder ulnar (im Insert rechts als Vektoren u und h bezeichnet) kommen kann [2,25]. Die symmetrische Distraktion erfolgt senkrecht zur Eingangsebene der Incisura trochlearis (Vektor s).…”

Section: Abbildung 18unclassified

“…Die symmetrische Distraktion erfolgt senkrecht zur Eingangsebene der Incisura trochlearis (Vektor s). Der Vektor s setzt sich aus den Vektoren u und h zusammen (Insert rechts) [2,25]. Das humeroulnare Gelenk sollte ohne Krepitation passiv durchbewegt werden können.…”

Section: Abbildung 18unclassified

“…It is continued by means of the arthrodiastasis beyond the normal amount to about double the normal radiologically visible joint space [25]. The symmetrical distraction of the joint should prevent posterior or anterior impingement, which can occur with humeral or ulnar distraction alone (indicated as vectors u and h in the right inset) [2,25]. The symmetrical distraction is perpendicular to the original plane of the trochlear notch (vector s).…”

Section: Figure 18mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The symmetrical distraction is perpendicular to the original plane of the trochlear notch (vector s). Vector s is composed of vectors u and h together (right inset) [2,25]. It should be possible to move the ulnohumeral joint passively without crepitation.…”

Section: Figure 18mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Der Bewegungsfixateur des Ellenbogens

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The case histories of ten patients treated for persistent instability of the elbow at 90 degrees flexion or for an old dislocation of the elbow between April 2001 and March 2003 were studied retrospectively. The average age was 51 years (40-62 years). In seven patients internal fixation of the elbow had to be performed, six of which were treated initially with an AO fixator. After an average of 8 days the management was changed to hinged fixation. The median Mayo Elbow Function Score was 78 points with two very good, three good, and five satisfactory results. Subjective satisfaction on the DASH Score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) revealed a slight reduction by an average of 18 points.

show abstract

Section: Abbildung 18unclassified

Section: Figure 18mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 18mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Der Bewegungsfixateur des Ellenbogens

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main challenges and problems posed by EA are: (1) the ideal surgical technique to achieve a primary stable construct with a solid fusion following the index procedure; (2) whether there is an indication for autologous bone grafting; (3) what degree of fusion angle should be chosen based on the patient's individual needs; and (4) whether or not the radial head should be resected. In light of a critical review of literature, the current study aimed to address some of these puzzling questions through investigation of a comprehensive sample of challenging cases.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%