2020
DOI: 10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.3013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaciones filogenéticas del subgénero Hypodictyon (Anura: Strabomantidae: Pristimantis) con la descripción de tres especies nuevas de la región del Chocó

Abstract: Taxonomía y sistemática Relaciones filogenéticas del subgénero Hypodictyon (Anura: Strabomantidae: Pristimantis) con la descripción de tres especies nuevas de la región del Chocó Phylogenetic relationships of the subgenus Hypodictyon (Anura: Strabomantidae: Pristimantis) with the description of three new species from the Chocó región

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We followed the nomenclature proposed by Grant et al [30], Guayasamin et al [31], Castroviejo-Fisher et al [32], Hedges et al [33] for Strabomantidae; all other taxa groups follow The Amphibian Species of the World [15]. Records from outside Ecuador were analyzed, error-checked, and improved with the same level of accuracy as the records from inside Ecuador [34], through a taxonomic assessment of specimens in scientific collections, validation of records based on biogeographic distribution, phylogenetics, taxonomic analyses, photographs published elsewhere [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], a systematic literature review, and by discussions with 33 expert herpetologist from all over the country, including the authors of this paper, held during eight workshops between 2017 and 2020. Workshop participants were distributed on boards according to taxonomic families and geographic regions.…”
Section: Amphibian Database Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the nomenclature proposed by Grant et al [30], Guayasamin et al [31], Castroviejo-Fisher et al [32], Hedges et al [33] for Strabomantidae; all other taxa groups follow The Amphibian Species of the World [15]. Records from outside Ecuador were analyzed, error-checked, and improved with the same level of accuracy as the records from inside Ecuador [34], through a taxonomic assessment of specimens in scientific collections, validation of records based on biogeographic distribution, phylogenetics, taxonomic analyses, photographs published elsewhere [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], a systematic literature review, and by discussions with 33 expert herpetologist from all over the country, including the authors of this paper, held during eight workshops between 2017 and 2020. Workshop participants were distributed on boards according to taxonomic families and geographic regions.…”
Section: Amphibian Database Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the generalized low support of the phylogenies emphasizes the need to increase the molecular dataset to reveal with confidence the evolutionary relationships within Pristimantis. This is clear from the recent changes in the phylogenetic position of several species (e.g., Hedges et al 2008;Padial et al 2014;Reyes-Puig et al 2020). In addition, it is still required to incorporate a large number of unassigned Colombian taxa into evolutionary based species groups.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Of Pristimantis Chamezensismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphologically, frogs of the genus Pristimantis are easily recognizable among other features by terminal discs on expanded digits and T-shaped terminal phalanges, a dentigerous process of the vomers usually present, and toe IV much longer than toe III (Hedges et al 2008;Duellman and Lehr 2009). However, this genus still has latent phylogenetic challenges (Navarrete et al 2016), and recent proposals, based on molecular phylogenies (Hedges et al 2008;Padial et al 2014;Páez and Ron 2019;Reyes-Puig et al 2020), reassigned or excluded members of the species groups from evolutionary arrangements, which were previously based solely on morphological evidence Duellman 1980, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of the genus Pristimantis are highly variable in coloration and morphology, often rendering it difficult to distinguish between species based on external features alone ( Batista et al 2014a ), while their phylogeny often remains unclear. Indeed, more than 315 species of Pristimantis are not assigned to any species group ( Padial et al 2014 ), and 124 species were described in the last 10 years with a rate of 11.3 species/year (e.g., Rivera-Correa and Daza 2016 ; Reyes-Puig et al 2020 ; Frost 2021 ). A relatively recent divergence and similar morphological character variations among species indicate a remarkable cryptic diversity within Pristimantis ( Ortega-Andrade et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%