2020
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapse-Fated Latent Diagnosis Subclones in Acute B Lineage Leukemia Are Drug Tolerant and Possess Distinct Metabolic Programs

Abstract: Disease recurrence causes signifi cant mortality in B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Genomic analysis of matched diagnosis and relapse samples shows relapse often arising from minor diagnosis subclones. However, why therapy eradicates some subclones while others survive and progress to relapse remains obscure. Elucidation of mechanisms underlying these differing fates requires functional analysis of isolated subclones. Here, large-scale limiting dilution xenografting of diagnosis and relapse … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential limitations to the use of targeted drugs in pediatric T-ALL include clonal heterogeneity of the disease, resulting in only partial elimination of leukemia cells upon therapy. Therefore, resistant clones may be selected and survive under the selective pressure of treatment (8,9). Similar resistance mechanisms have already been demonstrated for conventional chemotherapeutics such as the glucocorticoid-selected NR3C1 mutations (10)(11)(12) and the 6-mercaptopurine-selected NT5C2 mutations in chemoresistant relapsed ALL (11,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Potential limitations to the use of targeted drugs in pediatric T-ALL include clonal heterogeneity of the disease, resulting in only partial elimination of leukemia cells upon therapy. Therefore, resistant clones may be selected and survive under the selective pressure of treatment (8,9). Similar resistance mechanisms have already been demonstrated for conventional chemotherapeutics such as the glucocorticoid-selected NR3C1 mutations (10)(11)(12) and the 6-mercaptopurine-selected NT5C2 mutations in chemoresistant relapsed ALL (11,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[80][81][82][83] At diagnosis, minor relapse-initiating subclones can exhibit inherent resistance to chemotherapy, even before secondary mutation acquisition. 84 Other relapse-specific mutations in PRPS1, PRSP2, NT5C2, or MSH6, each influencing thiopurine metabolism, may emerge only during therapy, being driven by selective therapeutic pressure. 81,83,85,86 These mutations confer chemotherapy resistance and might have implications for disease monitoring and therapeutic decisions.…”
Section: Genetics Of Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to chemotherapy can be pre-existing (intrinsic) or drug-induced (acquired) ( Figure 1) [16]. Up to half of cancers exhibit intrinsic resistance, while 50% of the remaining half will acquire resistance as a result of treatment [17], even though deeper sequencing strategies at diagnosis might reveal that many presumed acquired resistances indeed was present in subclones already at diagnosis as demonstrated for leukaemia [18]. Both types of resistance are the result of altered drug metabolism and/or modified drug targets (reviewed in [15]).…”
Section: Chemotherapy Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%