2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1090-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapse to cocaine seeking increases activity-regulated gene expression differentially in the prefrontal cortex of abstinent rats

Abstract: Rationale-Alterations in the activity of the prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices of cocaine addicts have been linked with re-exposure to cocaine-associated stimuli. Objectives Using an animal model of relapse to cocaine seeking, the present study investigated the expression patterns of four different activity-regulated genes within prefrontal cortical brain regions after 22 h or 15 days of abstinence during context-induced relapse.Materials and methods-Rats self-administered cocaine or received yoked-saline … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(133 reference statements)
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b]. Inactive lever pressing was not significantly different during self-administration or testing between cocaine and yoked-saline animals (for details, see Hearing et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2b]. Inactive lever pressing was not significantly different during self-administration or testing between cocaine and yoked-saline animals (for details, see Hearing et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2b]. Inactive lever pressing during the 1 h test was significantly greater in animals with a cocaine history compared to yoked-saline treated animals (for details, see Hearing et al 2008). This difference in inactive lever responding likely represents an alternative means of obtaining drug when the lever previously associated with cocaine self-administration no longer provides the drug (Fuchs et al 2006;Berglind et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations