2022
DOI: 10.1177/20406207221099468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a therapeutic dilemma challenging the armamentarium of immunotherapies currently available (case reports)

Abstract: While survival rates in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) nowadays exceed 90%, systemic ALL relapse, especially after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is associated with a poor outcome. As there is currently no standardized treatment for this situation, individualized treatment is often pursued. Exemplified by two clinical scenarios, the aim of this article is to highlight the challenge for treating physicians to find a customized treatment strategy integrating the role of convention… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the EsPhALL2010 protocol, the 5-year overall and event-free survivals were 71.8% and 57.0%, respectively [ 14 ]. As an MRD level > 0.01% is associated with a significantly higher risk of relapse after HCT, pre-transplant reduction of disease burden to the lowest possible MRD is pivotal [ 15 ]. It is important to highlight that for the proposed indication, neither a complete MRD response nor hematologic RFS alone in a single-arm trial would be sufficient to support approval [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the EsPhALL2010 protocol, the 5-year overall and event-free survivals were 71.8% and 57.0%, respectively [ 14 ]. As an MRD level > 0.01% is associated with a significantly higher risk of relapse after HCT, pre-transplant reduction of disease burden to the lowest possible MRD is pivotal [ 15 ]. It is important to highlight that for the proposed indication, neither a complete MRD response nor hematologic RFS alone in a single-arm trial would be sufficient to support approval [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%