2016
DOI: 10.1080/02533952.2016.1218139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relatedness and care in Southern Africa and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, larger households may include a greater number of dependents, as each household is built around a core of working age adults; in this case, those able to provide care may be thinly spread. Furthermore, we cannot assume that families are structured so that household members are available and willing to provide care ( Manderson & Block, 2016 ); the structure of households can be complex and this complexity is not adequately captured by simple counts of household members ( Schatz et al, 2017 ). These factors may explain why we did not find household size to be associated with unmet needs, although this null finding also highlights the need for in-depth investigation of household dynamics in the context of caregiving in rural South Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, larger households may include a greater number of dependents, as each household is built around a core of working age adults; in this case, those able to provide care may be thinly spread. Furthermore, we cannot assume that families are structured so that household members are available and willing to provide care ( Manderson & Block, 2016 ); the structure of households can be complex and this complexity is not adequately captured by simple counts of household members ( Schatz et al, 2017 ). These factors may explain why we did not find household size to be associated with unmet needs, although this null finding also highlights the need for in-depth investigation of household dynamics in the context of caregiving in rural South Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As women illustrated in their narrative accounts, these experiences of care were mainly centred on their partner, then on immediate family members, friends, and others from various social networks and organisations. We present these below, in ways that reflect the relative significance of different individuals and relationships, and the variability of families, households, and other support structures in contemporary South Africa [36]. …”
Section: Partner Intimacy and Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes may influence both the capacity and the willingness of family members to provide care (Livingston 2005). Furthermore, chronic illness and disability can over time stretch material, social and psychological resources to breaking point, particularly in contexts of economic precarity (Manderson and Block 2016).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%