2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10775-007-9119-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relatedness between jobs and academic majors: its relationship to academic involvement of college students

Abstract: The study considered 10,072 third-year college students in Taiwan who had paid jobs while studying and found that students who worked in jobs related to their academic majors scored significantly higher on the academic involvement scale than students working in unrelated jobs. In addition, the effect of relatedness between jobs and majors did not interact significantly with either the effect of working on/off campus or the effect of working part-time/full-time.Résumé. Parenté entre jobs et majeures universitai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that our findings replicate previous research and support our predictions, which argue that humanities programs provide generic skills that are more likely to produce unrelated and overqualified employment than other programs. These results are consistent with studies conducted on more limited samples in Canada and the US (i.e., single universities, provinces, cities) (Chinaldo, 2010;Richards, 1984;Robst, 2007), as well as within European and Asian jurisdictions (e.g., Germany, Spain, Taiwan) (Bauer, 2000;Hartog, 2000;Huang, 2007). Interestingly, most researchers and academics acknowledge that humanities graduates experience significantly greater gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and communication skills compared to graduates from other programs (Akrum & Roksa, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is important to note that our findings replicate previous research and support our predictions, which argue that humanities programs provide generic skills that are more likely to produce unrelated and overqualified employment than other programs. These results are consistent with studies conducted on more limited samples in Canada and the US (i.e., single universities, provinces, cities) (Chinaldo, 2010;Richards, 1984;Robst, 2007), as well as within European and Asian jurisdictions (e.g., Germany, Spain, Taiwan) (Bauer, 2000;Hartog, 2000;Huang, 2007). Interestingly, most researchers and academics acknowledge that humanities graduates experience significantly greater gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and communication skills compared to graduates from other programs (Akrum & Roksa, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These interviews support suggestions by Huang (2007) and Riggert, Boyle, Petrosko, Ash, and Rude-Parkins (2006) that universities and departments must actively account for how student employment impacts students' capacity to engage in successful time management, high achievement, and efficient time to degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We were surprised how often engineering faculty, administrators, and staff complained that too many students work full-time jobs and part-time jobs that are unrelated to engineering, thus preventing them from meeting these expectations. These interviews support suggestions by Huang (2007) and Riggert, Boyle, Petrosko, Ash, and Rude-Parkins (2006) that universities and departments must actively account for how student employment impacts students' capacity to engage in successful time management, high achievement, and efficient time to degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For example, one study on involvement examined the relationship between jobs, academic majors, and academic involvement. The study used survey items to solicit responses about activities such as (a) class readings, (b) listening attentively during lectures, (c) contributing to class discussion, (d) use of school libraries, (e) reading scholarly books, and (f) discussing coursework with teachers outside of class (Huang, 2007).…”
Section: Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%