1998
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relatedness of matrilines, dispersing males and social groups in long–tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis)

Abstract: Genealogical relatedness is thought to be an important causal factor in the evolution of cooperation. We inferred relatedness on the basis of 11 blood protein markers using the Queller and Goodnight index of relatedness in a macaque population with long-term demographic records. This estimate re£ected independently determined pedigree relationships in our data set. Mean relatedness among all members of a social group was 0.10 but much higher levels of relatedness (0.30^0.47) were found among the members of mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Infant-male relationships also differ from relationships females establish amongst each other. In male dispersal species female relationships are strongly affected by maternal relatedness (Hamilton 1964;Ruiter and Geffen 1998;Silk et al 2006) which allows to predict one female's behaviour from the behaviour of a relative to some degree. Unlike females in matrilinearly structured societies the more individualistic males can also be expected to be independent of each other in developing preferences for certain infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infant-male relationships also differ from relationships females establish amongst each other. In male dispersal species female relationships are strongly affected by maternal relatedness (Hamilton 1964;Ruiter and Geffen 1998;Silk et al 2006) which allows to predict one female's behaviour from the behaviour of a relative to some degree. Unlike females in matrilinearly structured societies the more individualistic males can also be expected to be independent of each other in developing preferences for certain infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, using numerous unlinked loci each with high heterozygosity yields the best estimates of pairwise relatedness, although heterozygosity appears to be the more important of these two variables: Blouin et al (1996) found that nearly twice the number of loci with heterozygosities of 0.62 are needed to provide as accurate an estimate of relatedness as a given number of loci each with a heterozyogosity of 0.75. In practice, rarefaction analysis (e.g., Altmann et al, 1996;de Ruiter and Geffen, 1998; can be used to evaluate the resolution provided by a given number of loci. Briefly, rarefaction analysis is a bootstrapping procedure in which each iteration involves estimating relatedness values using genotype data from one randomly chosen locus and then examining how those R values change as data from successive random loci are incorporated into the estimate.…”
Section: Basic Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Ruiter and Geffen (1998) similarly compared average pairwise relatedness among different subgroups of individuals in three social groups of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) from Ketambe, Sumatra. Using 11 allozyme markers to genotype individuals and DNA fingerprinting to determine paternity, which allowed them to evaluate the extent to which their relatedness estimates conformed to expected patterns (e.g., father-offspring R expected ϭ 0.5, half sibling R expected ϭ 0.25), de Ruiter and Geffen (1998) found that male-male relatedness within social groups, on average, was lower than average female-female relatedness: adult males were essentially unrelated, while females were related to one another at the level of first cousins (Fig. 2D).…”
Section: Primate Molecular Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bonobos, chimpanzees and a few other species, males are the resident sex and females the dispersing sex (Struhsaker 1980;Strier 1999;Mitani et al 2000). Because members of the resident sex are expected to become closely related over evolutionary times (Hoelzer et al 1994;Altmann et al 1997;de Ruiter & Geffen 1998; but see above), thereby generating brotherhoods or matrilines of closely related members of the same sex, understanding the evolution of sex-biased dispersal lies at the core of all ultimate analyses of social behaviour (Gandon 1999;Storz 1999;Perrin & Mazalov 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%