Relating Neuroticism to Emotional Exhaustion: A Dynamic Approach to Personality

Abstract

We build on a novel model of personality [PersDyn] that captures three sources of individual differences (here applied to neuroticism): (1) one’s baseline level of behavior, affect, and cognitions (baseline); (2) the extent to which people experience different neuroticism levels (variability); and (3) the swiftness with which they return to their neuroticism baseline once they deviated from it (attractor strength). To illustrate the model, we apply the PersDyn model to the study of the relationship between neuroticism and emotional exhaustion. In the first study, we conducted a 5-day experience sampling study on 89 employees who reported on their level of state neuroticism six times per day. We found that higher levels of baseline neuroticism and variability were related to increased emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, we found an interaction effect between baseline and attractor strength: people with a high baseline and high attractor strength tend to experience a high degree of emotional exhaustion, whereas people with low levels of baseline neuroticism are less likely to suffer from exhaustion if their attractor strength is high. In the second study, we conducted a laboratory experiment on 163 participants, in which we manipulated state neuroticism via short movie clips. Although the PersDyn parameters were not related to post-experiment emotional exhaustion, the interaction effect between baseline and attractor strength was replicated. It is concluded that a dynamic approach to neuroticism is important in understanding emotional exhaustion.

Linking performance pressure to employee work engagement: the moderating role of emotional stability

“…Emotional stability, defined as an individual's capability to adequately cope with negative emotions, such as anxiety, stress and anger (Alessandri et al, 2018), has been considered as the basis of human personality. After conscientiousness, it is considered to be the most important personality trait in work contexts (Barrick and Mount, 2000) and a key individual characteristic that is negatively associated with stress-related variables, such as job burnout (Fornes-Vives et al, 2019), emotional exhaustion (Sosnowska et al, 2019), anxiety (Chen et al, 2020) and anger (Rogers and Barber, 2019). According to Lazarus's (1966) transactional theory of stress, certain personality traits influence the stress process because they have the tendency to alter how individuals process information about stressors.…”

The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: An overview of the field

“…They are typically investigated using change-as-outcome models or differential equations. Danvers, Wundrack, and Mehl (2019) Oravecz, Tuerlinckx, and Vandekerckhove 2011Oravecz, Tuerlinckx, and Vandekerckhove 2016Sosnowska et al (2019) Sosnowska, Hofmans, and De Fruyt (2019a) and Sosnowska et al (2019) examined state neuroticism fluctuations in a work context. They investigated individual differences in (1) baseline neuroticism state levels, (2) variability in state neuroticism, and (3) attractor strength (i.e., how quickly people return to their baseline level of neuroticism after deviations from it).…”

A dynamic systems approach to personality: The Personality Dynamics (PersDyn) model

“…Although it is challenging to conceptualize personality using the principles of dynamic systems theory, we will introduce a model that builds on its assumptions in a relatively straightforward and empirically testable way: the Personality Dynamics model (PersDyn; Sosnowska, Hofmans, & De Fruyt, 2016). The PersDyn model describes people's typical pattern of changes in one's personality space.…”