2015
DOI: 10.1111/add.13098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating off‐premises alcohol outlet density to intentional and unintentional injuries

Abstract: Aims This study investigated the hypotheses that (i) intentional and unintentional injuries occur more frequently in areas with greater density of off-premises alcohol outlets; and (ii) larger and chain outlets selling cheaper alcohol contribute more substantially to injury risk than smaller and independent outlets. Design Ecological cross-sectional. Setting From the 256 Statistical Area level 2 (SA2) Census units in Melbourne, Australia, we selected a random sample of 62 units. There were 2,119 Statistica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, this work can lead to a much deeper understanding of ecological impacts. For example, it is becoming apparent that outlets are related to violent assaults on quite small spatial scales [17], to motor vehicle collisions at local and city‐wide scales [18,19], and that they have different topological relationships to populations in urban versus rural areas [12,13]. Much of the variation in study results, glossed over by the analyses presented in Gmel et al ., may be due to these issues.…”
Section: Ecological Bias and The Modifiable Areal Unit Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, this work can lead to a much deeper understanding of ecological impacts. For example, it is becoming apparent that outlets are related to violent assaults on quite small spatial scales [17], to motor vehicle collisions at local and city‐wide scales [18,19], and that they have different topological relationships to populations in urban versus rural areas [12,13]. Much of the variation in study results, glossed over by the analyses presented in Gmel et al ., may be due to these issues.…”
Section: Ecological Bias and The Modifiable Areal Unit Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicates associations between increased consumption of alcohol at home and multiple health and social harms, not only for the drinker but also for other family and household members. There are links between the availability of alcohol for off‐premise consumption and harms such as traumatic injury and domestic violence , and between the consumption of alcohol in the home and intimate partner violence . Furthermore, witnessing drinking in the home may have negative impacts on children and adolescents , such as ‘normalising’ negative alcohol experiences and influencing future drinking behaviours .…”
Section: Drinking At Home—what Are the Risks?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality from alcohol-related harm is higher in areas of highest density compared to areas of low density with evidence from the UK (Richardson et al 2015), Canada (Stockwell et al 2011) and Switzerland (Spoerri et al 2013). Morbidity, including hospitalisations, emergency department visits and injuries have also been found to be higher in areas of highest alcohol outlet density (Cunradi et al 2012;Morrison et al 2015;Richardson et al 2015).…”
Section: Supply Side: Alcohol Outlet Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%