2007
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2007.385568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relating Primary Governing Frequency Response to Future Operating Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the amount of available frequency responsive reserve could change as the mix of resources providing the spinning reserve changed. Imposing specific frequency response capability requirements on spinning reserve resources would likely limit the spinning reserve supply and increase the price [20]. Energy prices could also be impacted since spinning reserve resources also supply energy.…”
Section: Proposal 3: Incorporate Frequency Responsive Reserve Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the amount of available frequency responsive reserve could change as the mix of resources providing the spinning reserve changed. Imposing specific frequency response capability requirements on spinning reserve resources would likely limit the spinning reserve supply and increase the price [20]. Energy prices could also be impacted since spinning reserve resources also supply energy.…”
Section: Proposal 3: Incorporate Frequency Responsive Reserve Requirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proposal is also recommended in [20] and, less explicitly, in [9]. The market would incorporate the reliability requirement of a minimum amount of frequency responsive reserve, similar to spinning reserve.…”
Section: Proposal 4: Separate Frequency Responsive Reserve Ancillary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Task Force on Generation Governing under the Power System Stability Subcommittee of the Power System Dynamic Performance Committee issued a report in May 2007 and presented a technical panel session at the IEEE Power and Energy Society (PES) General Meeting in July 2007 [68][69][70][71][72].…”
Section: Ieee Task Force Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%